The influence of different playing surfaces on the biomechanics of a tennis running forehand foot plant
Stiles VH, Dixon SJ
Journal of applied biomechanics · 14 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Controlled clinical trial (classified by our AI screen)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Mechanisms only
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2006-02-01 · J Appl Biomech · vol. 22 · issue 1 · pp. 14–24
- Publisher
- International Society of Biomechanics
- Cited
- 51 citations · more than 85% of similar papers · 1.8× the field average
- References
- 32 works
- Access
- Paywalled
- Research areas
- Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies · Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Performance and Training
- Keywords
- Kinematics, Ground reaction force, Cushioning, Biomechanics, Foot (prosody), Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Sports biomechanics, Mathematics, Physical therapy, Simulation, Materials science, Medicine, Anatomy, Engineering, Physics, Composite material
- MeSH
- foot, humans, transducers, pressure, movement, running, friction, stress, mechanical, weight-bearing, pressure, tennis, video recording, adolescent, adult, female, biomechanical phenomena
2 authors
From GB
- Victoria H. StilesUniversity of Exeter
- Sharon DixonUniversity of Exeter
Abstract
Research suggests that heightened impacts, altered joint movement patterns, and changes in friction coefficient from the use of artificial surfaces in sport increase the prevalence of overuse injuries. The purposes of this study were to (a) develop procedures to assess a tennis-specific movement, (b) characterize the ground reaction force (GRF) impact phases of the movement, and (c) assess human response during impact with changes in common playing surfaces. In relation to the third purpose it was hypothesized that surfaces with greatest mechanical cushioning would yield lower impact forces (PkFz) and rates of loading. Six shod volunteers performed 8 running forehand trials on each surface condition: baseline, carpet, acrylic, and artificial turf. Force plate (960 Hz) and kinematic data (120 Hz) were collected simultaneously for each trial. Running forehand foot plants are typically characterized by 3 peaks in vertical GRF prior to a foot-off peak. Group mean PkFz was significantly lower and peak braking force was significantly higher on the baseline surface compared with the other three test surfaces (p<0.05). No significant changes in initial kinematics were found to explain unexpected PkFz results. The baseline surface yielded a significantly higher coefficient of friction compared with the other three test surfaces (p<0.05). While the hypothesis is rejected, biomechanical analysis has revealed changes in surface type with regard to GRF variables.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.