Cohort study2007

Comparison of the incidence, nature and cause of injuries sustained on grass and new generation artificial turf by male and female football players. Part 1: match injuries

Fuller CW, Dick RW, Corlette J, Schmalz R

British journal of sports medicine · 111 citations

How it was studied

Design
Cohort study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Nonprofit
National Collegiate Athletic Association

Based on 1 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2007-07-23 · Br J Sports Med · vol. 41 · issue suppl 1 · pp. i20–i26
Publisher
BMJ
Cited
235 citations · more than 98% of similar papers · 8.6× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
19 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Sports injuries and prevention · Traumatic Brain Injury Research · Sport Psychology and Performance
Keywords
Football, Incidence (geometry), Football players, Medicine, Physical therapy, Geography, Mathematics, Archaeology
MeSH
humans, poaceae, athletic injuries, injury severity score, incidence, cohort studies, prospective studies, soccer, floors and floorcoverings, adolescent, adult, united states, female, male

4 authors

From GB, US

  • Colin W Fuller · correspondingUniversity of Nottingham
  • Randall W. DickNational Collegiate Athletic Association
  • Jill D. CorletteNational Collegiate Athletic Association
  • Rosemary SchmalzNational Collegiate Athletic Association

Abstract

Objective

To compare the incidence, nature, severity and cause of match injuries sustained on grass and new generation artificial turf by male and female footballers.

Methods

The National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System was used for a two-season (August to December) prospective study of American college and university football teams (2005 season: men 52 teams, women 64 teams; 2006 season: men 54 teams, women 72 teams). Injury definitions and recording procedures were compliant with the international consensus statement for epidemiological studies of injuries in football. Athletic trainers recorded details of the playing surface and the location, diagnosis, severity and cause of all match injuries. The number of days lost from training and match play was used to define the severity of an injury. Match exposures (player hours) were recorded on a team basis.

Results

The overall incidence of match injuries for men was 25.43 injuries/1000 player hours on artificial turf and 23.92 on grass (incidence ratio 1.06; p = 0.46) and for women was 19.15 injuries/1000 player hours on artificial turf and 21.79 on grass (incidence ratio = 0.88; p = 0.16). For men, the mean severity of non-season ending injuries was 7.1 days (median 5) on artificial turf and 8.4 days (median 5) on grass and, for women, 11.2 days (median 5) on artificial turf and 8.9 days (median 5) on grass. Joint (non-bone)/ligament/cartilage and contusion injuries to the lower limbs were the most common general categories of match injury on artificial turf and grass for both male and female players. Most injuries were acute (men: artificial turf 24.60, grass 22.91; p = 0.40; women: artificial turf 18.29, grass 20.64; p = 0.21) and resulted from player-to-player contact (men: artificial turf 14.73, grass 13.34; p = 0.37; women: artificial turf 10.72; grass 11.68; p = 0.50).

Conclusions

There were no major differences in the incidence, severity, nature or cause of match injuries sustained on new generation artificial turf and grass by either male or female players.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.