Randomized controlled trial2010

Dietary nitrate supplementation enhances muscle contractile efficiency during knee-extensor exercise in humans

Bailey SJ, Fulford J, Vanhatalo A, Winyard PG, Blackwell JR, DiMenna FJ, Wilkerson DP, Benjamin N, Jones AM

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 445 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2010-05-13 · J Appl Physiol (1985) · vol. 109 · issue 1 · pp. 135–148
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Cited
603 citations · more than 100% of similar papers · 95.4× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
83 works
Access
Paywalled
Research areas
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology · Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Keywords
Phosphocreatine, Nitrite, Dietary Nitrate, Chemistry, Animal science, Internal medicine, Crossover study, Nitrate, Endocrinology, Placebo, Medicine, Energy metabolism, Biology
MeSH
knee, muscle, skeletal, humans, beta vulgaris, nitrates, nitrites, phosphocreatine, pulmonary ventilation, exercise, oxygen consumption, muscle contraction, beverages, dietary supplements, adult, male, muscle strength, young adult

9 authors

From GB

  • Stephen J. BaileyUniversity of Exeter; Heavitree Hospital
  • Jonathan FulfordUniversity of Exeter; Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry
  • Anni Vanhatalo
  • Paul Graham WinyardUniversity of Exeter; Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry
  • Jamie R. Blackwell
  • Fred J. DiMenna

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to elucidate the mechanistic bases for the reported reduction in the O(2) cost of exercise following short-term dietary nitrate (NO(3)(-)) supplementation. In a randomized, double-blind, crossover study, seven men (aged 19-38 yr) consumed 500 ml/day of either nitrate-rich beet root juice (BR, 5.1 mmol of NO(3)(-)/day) or placebo (PL, with negligible nitrate content) for 6 consecutive days, and completed a series of low-intensity and high-intensity "step" exercise tests on the last 3 days for the determination of the muscle metabolic (using (31)P-MRS) and pulmonary oxygen uptake (Vo(2)) responses to exercise. On days 4-6, BR resulted in a significant increase in plasma [nitrite] (mean +/- SE, PL 231 +/- 76 vs. BR 547 +/- 55 nM; P < 0.05). During low-intensity exercise, BR attenuated the reduction in muscle phosphocreatine concentration ([PCr]; PL 8.1 +/- 1.2 vs. BR 5.2 +/- 0.8 mM; P < 0.05) and the increase in Vo(2) (PL 484 +/- 41 vs. BR 362 +/- 30 ml/min; P < 0.05). During high-intensity exercise, BR reduced the amplitudes of the [PCr] (PL 3.9 +/- 1.1 vs. BR 1.6 +/- 0.7 mM; P < 0.05) and Vo(2) (PL 209 +/- 30 vs. BR 100 +/- 26 ml/min; P < 0.05) slow components and improved time to exhaustion (PL 586 +/- 80 vs. BR 734 +/- 109 s; P < 0.01). The total ATP turnover rate was estimated to be less for both low-intensity (PL 296 +/- 58 vs. BR 192 +/- 38 microM/s; P < 0.05) and high-intensity (PL 607 +/- 65 vs. BR 436 +/- 43 microM/s; P < 0.05) exercise. Thus the reduced O(2) cost of exercise following dietary NO(3)(-) supplementation appears to be due to a reduced ATP cost of muscle force production. The reduced muscle metabolic perturbation with NO(3)(-) supplementation allowed high-intensity exercise to be tolerated for a greater period of time.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.