Randomized controlled trial2011

Effect of blueberry ingestion on natural killer cell counts, oxidative stress, and inflammation prior to and after 2.5 h of running

McAnulty LS, Nieman DC, Dumke CL, Shooter LA, Henson DA, Utter AC, Milne G, McAnulty SR

Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme · 93 citations

Review labels

Controlled feedingFunding not disclosedMechanisms only

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Mechanisms only
Intake measured by
Food provided by researchers

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2011-12-01 · Appl Physiol Nutr Metab · vol. 36 · issue 6 · pp. 976–984
Publisher
NRC Research Press
Cited
142 citations · more than 96% of similar papers · 5.9× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
38 works
Access
Paywalled
Research areas
Exercise and Physiological Responses · Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress · Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
Keywords
Oxidative stress, Inflammation, Urine, Antioxidant, Immune system, Endocrinology, Ingestion, Internal medicine, Ferric reducing ability of plasma, Natural killer cell, Medicine, Chemistry, Immunology, Biochemistry, Antioxidant capacity, Cytotoxic T cell
MeSH
killer cells, natural, humans, fruit, myositis, f2-isoprostanes, thymidine, anti-inflammatory agents, non-steroidal, interleukin-10, antioxidants, lymphocyte count, exercise, oxidative stress, physical endurance, running, adolescent, adult, young adult, athletes, biomarkers, blueberry plants

8 authors

From US

  • Lisa S. McAnultyAppalachian State University
  • David Christopher NiemanAppalachian State University
  • Charles L. DumkeUniversity of Montana
  • Lesli ShooterAppalachian State University
  • Dru Anne HensonAppalachian State University
  • Alan C. UtterAppalachian State University

Abstract

Blueberries are rich in antioxidants known as anthocyanins, which may exhibit significant health benefits. Strenous exercise is known to acutely generate oxidative stress and an inflammatory state, and serves as an on-demand model to test antioxidant and anti-inflammatory compounds. The purpose of this study was to examine whether 250 g of blueberries per day for 6 weeks and 375 g given 1 h prior to 2.5 h of running at ∼72% maximal oxygen consumption counters oxidative stress, inflammation, and immune changes. Twenty-five well-trained subjects were recruited and randomized into blueberry (BB) (N = 13) or control (CON) (N = 12) groups. Blood, muscle, and urine samples were obtained pre-exercise and immediately postexercise, and blood and urine 1 h postexercise. Blood was examined for F₂-isoprostanes for oxidative stress, cortisol, cytokines, homocysteine, leukocytes, T-cell function, natural killer (NK), and lymphocyte cell counts for inflammation and immune system activation, and ferric reducing ability of plasma for antioxidant capacity. Muscle biopsies were examined for glycogen and NFkB expression to evaluate stress and inflammation. Urine was tested for modification of DNA (8-OHDG) and RNA (5-OHMU) as markers of nucleic acid oxidation. A 2 (treatment) × 3 (time) repeated measures ANOVA was used for statistical analysis. Increases in F₂-isoprostanes and 5-OHMU were significantly less in BB and plasma IL-10 and NK cell counts were significantly greater in BB vs. CON. Changes in all other markers did not differ. This study indicates that daily blueberry consumption for 6 weeks increases NK cell counts, and acute ingestion reduces oxidative stress and increases anti-inflammatory cytokines.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.