Study2012

Cerebrovascular and corticomotor function during progressive passive hyperthermia in humans

Ross EZ, Cotter JD, Wilson L, Fan JL, Lucas SJ, Ainslie PN

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 57 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Controlled clinical trial (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2011-12-03 · J Appl Physiol (1985) · vol. 112 · issue 5 · pp. 748–758
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Cited
73 citations · more than 91% of similar papers · 2.7× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
42 works
Access
Paywalled
Research areas
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control · Thermoregulation and physiological responses · Thermal Regulation in Medicine
Keywords
Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Anesthesia, Medicine, Middle cerebral artery, Hyperthermia, Cerebral blood flow, Ventilation (architecture), Cardiology, Stimulation, Femoral artery, Perfusion, Internal medicine, Ischemia
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, knee joint, middle cerebral artery, motor cortex, femoral nerve, humans, hyperventilation, fever, hypocapnia, carbon dioxide, blood flow velocity, electromyography, body temperature, blood pressure, cerebrovascular circulation, respiration, adult, female, male, transcranial magnetic stimulation

6 authors

From GB, NZ, CH, CA

  • EMMA Z. ROSS · correspondingBrunel University of London; University of Brighton
  • James David Cotter
  • Luke C. WilsonUniversity of Otago
  • Jui‐Lin FanUniversity of Geneva
  • Samuel J. E. LucasUniversity of Otago
  • Philip Neil AinslieUniversity of British Columbia; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus

Abstract

The present study examined the integrative effects of passive heating on cerebral perfusion and alterations in central motor drive. Eight participants underwent passive hyperthermia [0.5°C increments in core temperature (Tc) from normothermia (37 ± 0.3°C) to their limit of thermal tolerance (T-LIM; 39.0 ± 0.4°C)]. Blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery (CBFv) and respiratory responses were measured continuously. Arterial blood gases and blood pressure were obtained intermittently. At baseline and each Tc level, supramaximal femoral nerve stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were performed to assess neuromuscular and cortical function, respectively. At T-LIM, measures were (in a randomized order) also made during a period of breathing 5% CO(2) gas to restore eucapnia (+5% CO(2)). Mean heating time was 179 ± 51 min, with each 0.5°C increment in Tc taking 40 ± 10 min. CBFv was reduced by ∼20% below baseline from +0.5°C until T-LIM. Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the knee extensors was decreased at T-LIM (-9 ± 10%; P < 0.05), and cortical voluntary activation (VA), assessed by TMS, was decreased at +1.5°C and T-LIM by 11 ± 8 and 22 ± 23%, respectively (P < 0.05). Corticospinal excitability (measured as the EMG response produced by TMS) was unaltered. Reductions in cortical VA were related to changes in ventilation (Ve; R(2) = 0.76; P < 0.05) and partial pressure of end-tidal CO(2) (Pet(CO(2)); R(2) = 0.63; P < 0.05) and to changes in CBFv (R(2) = 0.61; P = 0.067). Interestingly, although CBFv was not fully restored, MVC and cortical VA were restored towards baseline values during inhalation of 5% CO(2). These results indicate that descending voluntary drive becomes progressively impaired as Tc is increased, presumably due, in part, to reductions in CBFv and to hyperthermia-induced hyperventilation and subsequent hypocapnia.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.