Cohort study2013Industry funded

Funded in part by Novo Nordisk Fonden

High intakes of protein and processed meat associate with increased incidence of type 2 diabetes

Ericson U, Sonestedt E, Gullberg B, Hellstrand S, Hindy G, Wirfält E, Orho-Melander M

The British journal of nutrition · 86 citations

Review labels

Industry fundedNo stated lifestyle adjustment

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Cohort study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Food diaries or recalls

Who paid for it

Funding
Industry funded
Company
Novo Nordisk Fonden
Government
Medical Research Council

Based on 2 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2012-08-01 · Br J Nutr · vol. 109 · issue 6 · pp. 1143–1153
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Cited
119 citations · more than 94% of similar papers · 3.7× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
48 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Diet and metabolism studies · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Keywords
Medicine, Type 2 diabetes, Diabetes mellitus, Hazard ratio, Incidence (geometry), Cohort study, Cohort, Population, Internal medicine, Animal science, Endocrinology, Biology, Confidence interval, Environmental health
MeSH
animals, humans, diabetes mellitus, type 2, dietary carbohydrates, dietary fats, dietary proteins, body mass index, exercise, diet, risk factors, cohort studies, prospective studies, body composition, dietary fiber, meat products, aged, middle aged, educational status, female, male, waist circumference

7 authors

From SE

  • Ulrika Ericson · correspondingLund University
  • Emily SonestedtLund University
  • Bo GullbergLund University
  • Sophie HellstrandLund University
  • George HindyLund University
  • Elisabet WirfältLund University

Abstract

Diets high in protein have shown positive effects on short-term weight reduction and glycaemic control. However, the understanding of how dietary macronutrient composition relates to long-term risk of type 2 diabetes is limited. The aim of the present study was to examine intakes of macronutrients, fibre and protein sources in relation to incident type 2 diabetes. In total, 27 140 individuals, aged 45-74 years, from the population-based Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort, were included. Dietary data were collected with a modified diet history method, including registration of cooked meals. During 12 years of follow-up, 1709 incident type 2 diabetes cases were identified. High protein intake was associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes (hazard ratio (HR) 1.27 for highest compared with lowest quintile; 95 % CI 1.08, 1.49; P for trend = 0.01). When protein consumption increased by 5 % of energy at the expense of carbohydrates (HR 1.20; 95 % CI 1.09, 1.33) or fat (HR 1.21; 95 % CI 1.09, 1.33), increased diabetes risk was observed. Intakes in the highest quintiles of processed meat (HR 1.16; 95 % CI 1.00, 1.36; P for trend = 0.01) and eggs (HR 1.21; 95 % CI 1.04, 1.41; P for trend = 0.02) were associated with increased risk. Intake of fibre-rich bread and cereals was inversely associated with type 2 diabetes (HR 0.84; 95 % CI 0.73, 0.98; P for trend = 0.004). In conclusion, results from the present large population-based prospective study indicate that high protein intake is associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes. Replacing protein with carbohydrates may be favourable, especially if fibre-rich breads and cereals are chosen as carbohydrate sources.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.