Cross-sectional study2013Industry funded

Funded in part by PepsiCo, General Mills

Whole grain consumption is inversely associated with BMI Z-score in rural school-aged children

Choumenkovitch SF, McKeown NM, Tovar A, Hyatt RR, Kraak VI, Hastings AV, Herzog JB, Economos CD

Public health nutrition · 31 citations

Review labels

Food frequency questionnaireIndustry funded

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Cross-sectional study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Food frequency questionnaire

Who paid for it

Funding
Industry funded
Company
PepsiCo
Company
General Mills
University or hospital
Deakin University

Based on 3 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2012-08-16 · Public Health Nutr · vol. 16 · issue 2 · pp. 212–218
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Cited
49 citations · more than 94% of similar papers · 4.2× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
49 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Food composition and properties · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
Whole grains, Medicine, Overweight, Refined grains, Obesity, Logistic regression, Demography, Physical activity, Residence, Childhood obesity, Cross-sectional study, Odds ratio, Body mass index, Environmental health, Standard score, Gerontology, Food science, Internal medicine, Physical therapy, Mathematics
MeSH
humans, obesity, body mass index, diet, logistic models, odds ratio, cross-sectional studies, energy intake, food handling, child, rural population, united states, female, male, edible grain

8 authors

From US

  • Silvina Furlong Choumenkovitch · correspondingTufts University
  • Nicola Mary McKeownTufts University; Jean Mayer Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging
  • Alison TovarTufts University
  • Raymond R. HyattTufts University
  • Vivica I. KraakSave the Children
  • Alia V HastingsTufts University

Abstract

Objective

To examine the relationship between intake of whole grains and BMI Z-score in rural children.

Design

General linear models and logistic regression were used to examine the cross-sectional associations between whole grain intake and BMI Z-score, prevalence and odds ratios of overweight and obesity. Dietary intake was assessed using the Block Food Screener for ages 2-17 years. Children were classified into three categories according to servings of whole grain intake: 1·5 servings/d.

Setting

The CHANGE (Creating Healthy, Active and Nurturing Growing-up Environments) study, an obesity prevention intervention in elementary schools in eight rural US communities in California, Mississippi, Kentucky and South Carolina.

Subjects

Seven hundred and ninety-two children attending 3rd-6th grade.

Results

After adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, physical activity and state of residence, whole grain intake was inversely associated with BMI Z-score (0·90 v. 0·61 in the lowest v. the highest whole grain intake category; P trend = 0·01). Children who consumed >1·5 servings of whole grains/d had a 40 % lower risk of being obese (OR = 0·60; 95 % CI 0·38, 0·95, P = 0·02) compared with children who consumed <1·0 serving/d. Further adjustment for potential dietary predictors of body weight (fruit, vegetable and dairy intakes) did not change the observed associations.

Conclusions

Increasing the intake of whole grains as part of an overall healthy lifestyle may be beneficial for children to achieve and maintain a healthy weight.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.