Systematic review2012

Low level laser therapy for the treatment of temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of the literature

Melis M, Di Giosia M, Zawawi KH

Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice · 38 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Systematic review (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2012-10-01 · Cranio · vol. 30 · issue 4 · pp. 304–312
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Cited
81 citations · more than 67% of similar papers · 0.9× the field average
References
35 works
Access
Paywalled
Research areas
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Keywords
Low level laser therapy, Medicine, Laser therapy, Randomized controlled trial, Placebo, Duration (music), Laser, Physical therapy, Surgery, Alternative medicine, Pathology, Optics
MeSH
masticatory muscles, humans, temporomandibular joint disorders, muscular diseases, placebos, treatment outcome, radiotherapy dosage, randomized controlled trials as topic, low-level light therapy

3 authors

  • Marcello Melis
  • Massimiliano Di Giosia
  • Khalid H. Zawawi

Abstract

The authors performed a review of the literature to evaluate the efficacy of low level laser therapy (LLLT) for the treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Selection criteria included: 1) human subjects, 2) articles written in English, and 3) randomized placebo-controlled trials. Evaluation was performed according to the CONSORT 2010 criteria. A total of 14 articles were included in the review. Studies varied considerably in terms of methodological design, particularly regarding the site of application of the laser beam, the number of applications performed, their duration, the laser beam features (wavelength, frequency, output, dosage), and outcome measures. The outcome of the trials was controversial and not particularly related to any features of the laser beam, to the number of laser applications, and their duration. Based on the results of this review no definitive conclusions can be drawn on the efficacy of LLLT for the treatment of TMD. Many methodological differences among the studies, especially regarding the number and duration of laser applications and characteristics of the laser beam (wavelength, frequency, output), do not allow for standardized guidelines for effective treatment with LLLT. The only indication seems to be that LLLT is probably more effective for the treatment of TMJ disorders, and less effective for the treatment of masticatory muscle disorders.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.