Randomized controlled trial2013

Postexercise cold-water immersion does not attenuate muscle glycogen resynthesis

Gregson W, Allan R, Holden S, Phibbs P, Doran D, Campbell I, Waldron S, Joo CH, Morton JP

Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 29 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2013-02-01 · Med Sci Sports Exerc · vol. 45 · issue 6 · pp. 1174–1181
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Cited
41 citations · more than 92% of similar papers · 3.9× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
40 works
Access
Paywalled
Research areas
Exercise and Physiological Responses · Thermoregulation and physiological responses · Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
Glycogen, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Ingestion, Medicine, Morning, Skeletal muscle, Chemistry
MeSH
thigh, muscle, skeletal, humans, glycogen, body temperature, exercise, baths, cross-over studies, bicycling, adult, male, cold temperature, young adult, healthy volunteers, biomarkers

9 authors

From GB

  • Warren A. GregsonLiverpool John Moores University
  • Robert AllanLiverpool John Moores University
  • Susan HoldenLiverpool John Moores University
  • Padraic J. PhibbsLiverpool John Moores University
  • Dominic A. DoranLiverpool John Moores University
  • Iain T CampbellWythenshawe Hospital; Liverpool John Moores University

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that postexercise cold-water immersion (CWI, via its associated reductions in skeletal muscle blood flow) attenuates muscle glycogen resynthesis during short-term recovery from exhaustive exercise.

Methods

In a repeated-measures design, nine recreationally active men performed an exhaustive glycogen depleting cycling protocol (consisting of intermittent exercise the night before and steady-state exercise on the subsequent morning of the main trial) followed by 10 min of lower-limb CWI (8°C) or remained seated in normal ambient conditions (CONT). Subjects were fed carbohydrate (CHO) at an ingestion rate of 0.6 g·kg body mass at 30 min postexercise and at 1, 2, and 3 h postexercise.

Results

Reductions in thigh skin temperature and muscle temperature during postexercise recovery were greater in CWI compared with CONT (P < 0.01). In addition, norepinephrine and blood glucose concentrations were increased and decreased, respectively, during recovery in CWI compared with CONT (P < 0.01). Postexercise muscle glycogen (CONT and CWI postexercise = 76 ± 43 and 77 ± 26 mmol·kg dry weight [dw], respectively; mean ± SD) progressively increased (P < 0.01) during recovery, although rates of resynthesis did not differ (P = 0.719) between conditions (CONT and CWI 4 h postexercise = 160 ± 34 and 157 ± 59 mmol·kg dw, respectively). Total glycogen synthesis during recovery was comparable (CONT and CWI = 83 ± 43 and 79 ± 58 mmol·kg dw, respectively).

Conclusions

Postexercise CWI does not attenuate muscle glycogen resynthesis rates during short-term recovery even when CHO availability is considered suboptimal. Athletes who regularly incorporate CWI as a recovery strategy to alleviate symptoms of exercise-induced muscle damage should therefore not be concerned with potential negative effects of the associated reductions in muscle blood flow on the restoration of muscle glycogen stores.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.