Meta-analysis2013Open access

Gay saunas and the risks of HIV and syphilis transmissions in China--results of a meta-analysis

Lau JT, Zhao JK, Wu XB, Gu J, Hao C

The journal of sexual medicine · 16 citations

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding

Based on full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2013-03-01 · J Sex Med · vol. 10 · issue 3 · pp. 642–652
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Cited
24 citations · more than 45% of similar papers · 0.4× the field average
References
40 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Sex work and related issues
Keywords
Syphilis, China, Meta-analysis, Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Medicine, Virology, Political science, Law, Internal medicine
MeSH
humans, syphilis, hiv infections, steam bath, prevalence, odds ratio, risk-taking, homosexuality, male, public facilities, internet, china, male, surveys and questionnaires

5 authors

From CN, HK, CH

  • JosephT. F. Lau · correspondingSun Yat-sen University; Chinese University of Hong Kong; China Primary Health Care Foundation
  • Jinkou ZhaoGlobal Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria; SGS (Switzerland); Medicines for Malaria Venture
  • Xiaobing WuChinese University of Hong Kong; China Primary Health Care Foundation
  • Jing GuSun Yat-sen University
  • Chun Yan HaoSun Yat-sen University

Abstract

Introduction

Previous studies suggest the risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission among men who have sex with men (MSM) is associated with characteristics of venues. However, very few studies have systematically compared HIV/sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevalence among MSM according to key venue type for sourcing sex partners.

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between HIV/syphilis prevalence and the types of venues, namely saunas, parks, gay bars, and the Internet, which are mostly used for sourcing male sex partners by MSM in China.

Methods

Meta-analyses using fixed-effect and random-effect methods were conducted. Secondary data were obtained from 10 concurrent surveys conducted in 10 cities basing on a common protocol. Pairwise comparisons (e.g., "saunas" vs. "parks") were made.

Main outcomes measures

Odds ratios (OR) for HIV/syphilis infection in relations to venue type for partner sourcing.

Results

The distribution of the most commonly used source to recruit male sex partner was 59.32% (Internet), 18.47% (gay bars), 14.18% (gay saunas), and 8.02% (parks). The median prevalence of HIV/syphilis was 10.49% and 19.38% (gay saunas), 2.12% and 16.25% (parks), 6.06% and 15.45% (Internet), and 4.41% and 11.90% (gay bars). We found significant between-group differences when comparing "sauna" against "Internet" (HIV: OR= 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.65-3.12; syphilis: OR = 1.61, 95% CI= 1.07-2.41), "sauna" against "bars" (HIV: OR= 1.65, 95% CI= 1.14-2.39; syphilis: OR= 1.35, 95% CI= 1.02-1.78), and "parks" against "Internet" (syphilis: OR= 1.55, 95% CI= 1.12-2.15) as the main source to recruit male sex partners. Other pairwise comparisons were not statistically significant.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that those sourcing partners mainly from gay saunas have higher prevalence of HIV/syphilis when compared with those doing so via the Internet or gay bars. Venue based (sauna-based) interventions using socio-ecological approaches are greatly warranted in order to reduce HIV and syphilis prevalence among MSM in China.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.