Randomized controlled trial2013

Efficacy of low-level laser therapy on scar tissue

Freitas CP, Melo C, Alexandrino AM, Noites A

Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy : official publication of the European Society for Laser Dermatology · 21 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2013-04-22 · J Cosmet Laser Ther · vol. 15 · issue 3 · pp. 171–176
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Cited
34 citations · more than 81% of similar papers · 1.5× the field average
References
45 works
Access
Open access (repository copy) · OTHER-OA
Research areas
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Dermatologic Treatments and Research · Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Keywords
Medicine, Scars, Low level laser therapy, Itching, Placebo, Laser therapy, Surgery, Dermatology, Laser, Pathology
MeSH
cicatrix, humans, pain measurement, treatment outcome, chi-square distribution, statistics, nonparametric, longitudinal studies, pilot projects, adolescent, adult, female, male, physical therapy modalities, low-level light therapy

4 authors

From PT

  • Carla P. Freitas · correspondingPolytechnic Institute of Porto
  • Cristina Argel de MeloPolytechnic Institute of Porto
  • Ana Silva AlexandrinoPolytechnic Institute of Porto
  • Andreia NoitesPolytechnic Institute of Porto

Abstract

Background

Physiotherapy has a very important role in the maintenance of the integumentary system integrity. There is very few evidence in humans. Nevertheless, there are some studies about tissue regeneration using low-level laser therapy (LLLT).

Aim

To analyze the effectiveness of LLLT on scar tissue.

Methods

Seventeen volunteers were stratified by age of their scars, and then randomly assigned to an experimental group (EG) - n = 9 - and a placebo group (PG) - n = 8. Fifteen sessions were conducted to both the groups thrice a week. However, in the PG, the laser device was switched off. Scars' thickness, length, width, macroscopic aspect, pain threshold, pain perception, and itching were measured.

Results

After 5 weeks, there were no statistically significant differences in any variable between both the groups. However, analyzing independently each group, EG showed a significant improvement in macroscopic aspect (p = 0.003) using LLLT. Taking into account the scars' age, LLLT showed a tendency to decrease older scars' thickness in EG.

Conclusion

The intervention with LLLT appears to have a positive effect on the macroscopic scars' appearance, and on old scars' thickness, in the studied sample. However, it cannot be said for sure that LLLT has influence on scar tissue.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.