Red meat consumption is associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes in men but not in women: a Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study
Kurotani K, Nanri A, Goto A, Mizoue T, Noda M, Oba S, Kato M, Matsushita Y, Inoue M, Tsugane S, Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study Group
The British journal of nutrition · 41 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Cohort study (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Clinical events such as disease or death
- Intake measured by
- Food frequency questionnaire
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Independent funding
- Government
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
- Government
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
- Grants
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (H19‐016); Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (19shi-2); Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25871168)
Based on 2 listed funder(s).
Publication
- Published
- 2013-05-07 · Br J Nutr · vol. 110 · issue 10 · pp. 1910–1918
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Cited
- 63 citations · more than 94% of similar papers · 4.5× the field average
- Impact
- Top 10% most cited in its field
- References
- 46 works
- Access
- Free to read
- Research areas
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
- Keywords
- Red meat, Medicine, Diabetes mellitus, Type 2 diabetes, Prospective cohort study, Quartile, Incidence (geometry), Logistic regression, Kidney disease, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Confidence interval
- MeSH
- animals, poultry, cattle, swine, humans, diabetes mellitus, type 2, diet, diet surveys, incidence, odds ratio, risk factors, prospective studies, sex factors, meat, meat products, adult, middle aged, japan, female, male, self report, surveys and questionnaires
10 authors
From JP
- Kayo Kurotani · correspondingNational Center for Global Health and Medicine
- Akiko NanriNational Center for Global Health and Medicine
- Atsushi GotoNational Center for Global Health and Medicine
- Tetsuya MizoueNational Center for Global Health and Medicine
- Mitsuhiko NodaNational Center for Global Health and Medicine
- Shino ObaNational Institute of Public Health
Abstract
The relationship between different types of meat intake and the risk of type 2 diabetes remains unclear. We prospectively examined the association between total meat, total red meat, unprocessed red meat, processed meat and poultry intake and the incidence of type 2 diabetes. Subjects were 27 425 men and 36 424 women aged 45–75 years who participated in the second survey of the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study, and had no history of type 2 diabetes, cancer, stroke, IHD, chronic liver disease or kidney disease. Meat intake was estimated using a validated 147-item FFQ. OR of self-reported, physician-diagnosed type 2 diabetes over 5 years were estimated using a multiple logistic regression. A total of 1178 newly diagnosed cases of type 2 diabetes were self-reported. Intakes of total meat and total red meat were associated with the increased risk of type 2 diabetes in men but not in women. The multivariate-adjusted OR for the highest quartile compared with the lowest quartile of total meat and total red meat intake were 1·36 (95% CI 1·07, 1·73; P for trend=0·006) and 1·48 (95% CI 1·15, 1·90; P for trend=0·003) for men, respectively, and 0·82 (95% CI 0·62, 1·09; P for trend=0·14) and 0·77 (95% CI 0·57, 1·02; P for trend=0·08) for women, respectively. Intakes of processed red meat and poultry were not associated with the increased risk of diabetes in either men or women. In conclusion, elevated intake of red meat is associated with the increased risk of type 2 diabetes in Japanese men but not in women.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.