Randomized controlled trial2014

Combining functional features of whole-grain barley and legumes for dietary reduction of cardiometabolic risk: a randomised cross-over intervention in mature women

Tovar J, Nilsson A, Johansson M, Björck I

The British journal of nutrition · 41 citations

Review labels

Controlled feeding

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Food provided by researchers

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
VINNOVA
University or hospital
Lunds Universitet

Based on 2 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2013-09-24 · Br J Nutr · vol. 111 · issue 4 · pp. 706–714
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Cited
61 citations · more than 94% of similar papers · 3.9× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
51 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Food composition and properties · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Keywords
Overweight, Cholesterol, Refined grains, Medicine, Food science, Animal science, Obesity, Biology, Whole grains, Internal medicine
MeSH
colon, humans, fabaceae, hordeum, triticum, seeds, cardiovascular diseases, obesity, hydrogen, cholesterol, gamma-glutamyltransferase, apolipoproteins b, plant preparations, diet, risk factors, cross-over studies, blood pressure, drug synergism, dietary fiber, middle aged, female, cholesterol, ldl, functional food, biomarkers

4 authors

From SE

  • Juscelino Tovar · correspondingLund University
  • Anne C. NilssonLund University
  • Maria JohanssonLund University
  • Inger BjörckLund University

Abstract

The usefulness of dietary strategies against cardiometabolic risk is increasingly being acknowledged. Legumes and whole grains can modulate risk markers associated with cardiometabolic diseases, but their possible additive/synergistic actions are unknown. The objective of the present study was to assess, in healthy subjects, the effect of a diet including specific whole-grain barley products and legumes with prior favourable outcomes on cardiometabolic risk parameters in semi-acute studies. A total of forty-six overweight women (50-72 years, BMI 25-33 kg/m² and normal fasting glycaemia) participated in a randomised cross-over intervention comparing a diet rich in kernel-based barley products, brown beans and chickpeas (D1, diet 1 (functional diet)) with a control diet (D2, diet 2 (control diet)) of similar macronutrient composition but lacking legumes and barley. D1 included 86 g (as eaten)/d brown beans, 82 g/d chickpeas, 58 g/d whole-grain barley kernels and 216 g/d barley kernel bread. Both diets followed the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations, providing similar amounts of dietary fibre (D1: 46·9 g/d; D2: 43·5 g/d), with wheat-based products as the main fibre supplier in D2. Each diet was consumed for 4 weeks under weight-maintenance conditions. Both diets decreased serum total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol levels, but D1 had a greater effect on total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol levels (P< 0·001 and P< 0·05, respectively). D1 also reduced apoB (P< 0·001) and γ-glutamyl transferase (P< 0·05) levels, diastolic blood pressure (P< 0·05) and the Framingham cardiovascular risk estimate (P< 0·05). D1 increased colonic fermentative activity, as judged from the higher (P< 0·001) breath hydrogen levels recorded. In conclusion, a specific barley/legume diet improves cardiometabolic risk-associated biomarkers in a healthy cohort, showing potential preventive value beyond that of a nutritionally well-designed regimen.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.