Study2013Open access

Effect of hypohydration on peripheral and corticospinal excitability and voluntary activation

Bowtell JL, Avenell G, Hunter SP, Mileva KN

PloS one · 18 citations

How it was studied

Design
Controlled clinical trial (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Possibly industry funded

Based on full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2013-10-02 · PLoS One · vol. 8 · issue 10 · p. e77004
Publisher
Public Library of Science
Cited
28 citations · more than 75% of similar papers · 1.0× the field average
References
33 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Thermoregulation and physiological responses · Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control · Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
Isometric exercise, Medicine, Peripheral, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Anesthesia, Biceps, Electromyography, Internal medicine, Stimulation, Cardiology, Physical medicine and rehabilitation
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, motor cortex, spinal cord, motor neurons, humans, dehydration, electromyography, fluid therapy, exercise, electric stimulation, evoked potentials, motor, muscle fatigue, isometric contraction, torque, adult, male, transcranial magnetic stimulation, athletes

4 authors

From GB

  • Joanna L. Bowtell · correspondingUniversity of Exeter; London South Bank University
  • Gareth AvenellLondon South Bank University
  • Steven P. HunterLondon South Bank University
  • Katya N. MilevaLondon South Bank University

Abstract

We investigated whether altered peripheral and/or corticospinal excitatory output and voluntary activation are implicated in hypohydration-induced reductions in muscle isometric and isokinetic (90°.s(-1)) strength. Nine male athletes completed two trials (hypohydrated, euhydrated) comprising 90 min cycling at 40°C, with body weight losses replaced in euhydrated trial. Peripheral nerve and transcranial magnetic stimulations were applied during voluntary contractions pre- and 40 min post-exercise to quantify voluntary activation and peripheral (M-wave) and corticospinal (motor evoked potential) evoked responses in m. vastus medialis. Both maximum isometric (-15.3±3.1 vs -5.4±3.5%) and isokinetic eccentric (-24.8±4.6 vs -7.3±7.2%) torque decreased to a greater extent in hypohydrated than euhydrated trials (p<0.05). Half relaxation time of the twitch evoked by peripheral nerve stimulation during maximal contractions increased after exercise in the hypohydrated (21.8±9.3%) but stayed constant in the euhydrated (1.6±10.7%; p = 0.017) condition. M-wave amplitude during maximum voluntary contraction increased after exercise in the heat in hypohydrated (10.7±18.0%) but decreased in euhydrated condition (-17.4±16.9%; p = 0.067). Neither peripheral nor cortical voluntary activation were significantly different between conditions. Motor evoked potential amplitude increased similarly in both conditions (hypohydrated: 25.7±28.5%; euhydrated: 52.9±33.5%) and was accompanied by lengthening of the cortical silent period in euhydrated but not hypohydrated condition (p = 0.019). Different neural strategies seem to be adopted to regulate neural drive in the two conditions, with increases in inhibitory input of either intracortical or corticospinal origin during the euhydrated trial. Such changes were absent in the hypohydrated condition, yet voluntary activation was similar to the euhydrated condition, perhaps due to smaller increases in excitatory drive rather than increased inhibition. Despite this maximal isometric and eccentric strength were impaired in the hypohydrated condition. The increase in peripheral muscle excitability evident in the hypohydrated condition was not sufficient to preserve performance in the face of reduced muscle contractility or impaired excitation-contraction coupling.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.