Meta-analysis2014

Red meat and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis

Larsson SC, Orsini N

American journal of epidemiology · 201 citations

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
University or hospital
Karolinska Institutet

Based on 1 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2013-10-22 · Am J Epidemiol · vol. 179 · issue 3 · pp. 282–289
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Cited
355 citations · more than 95% of similar papers · 3.8× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
29 works
Access
Paywalled
Research areas
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Keywords
Red meat, Processed meat, Medicine, Confidence interval, Meta-analysis, Relative risk, Prospective cohort study, Food science, Internal medicine, Biology, Pathology
MeSH
animals, cattle, swine, humans, diet, models, statistical, risk, meat, meat products, united states, china, europe

2 authors

From SE

  • Susanna C. Larsson · correspondingKarolinska Institutet
  • Nicola Orsini

Abstract

High consumption of red meat and processed meat has been associated with increased risk of several chronic diseases. We conducted a meta-analysis to summarize the evidence from prospective studies on red meat and processed meat consumption in relationship to all-cause mortality. Pertinent studies were identified by searching PubMed through May 2013 and by reviewing the reference lists of retrieved articles. Prospective studies that reported relative risks with 95% confidence intervals for the association of red meat or processed meat consumption with all-cause mortality were eligible. Study-specific results were combined by using a random-effects model. Nine prospective studies were included in the meta-analysis. The summary relative risks of all-cause mortality for the highest versus the lowest category of consumption were 1.10 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98, 1.22; n = 6 studies) for unprocessed red meat, 1.23 (95% CI: 1.17, 1.28; n = 6 studies) for processed meat, and 1.29 (95% CI: 1.24, 1.35; n = 5 studies) for total red meat. In a dose-response meta-analysis, consumption of processed meat and total red meat, but not unprocessed red meat, was statistically significantly positively associated with all-cause mortality in a nonlinear fashion. These results indicate that high consumption of red meat, especially processed meat, may increase all-cause mortality.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.