Red meat and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis
Larsson SC, Orsini N
American journal of epidemiology · 201 citations
How it was studied
- Design
- Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Clinical events such as disease or death
- Intake measured by
- Not stated
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Independent funding
- University or hospital
- Karolinska Institutet
Based on 1 listed funder(s).
Publication
- Published
- 2013-10-22 · Am J Epidemiol · vol. 179 · issue 3 · pp. 282–289
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Cited
- 355 citations · more than 95% of similar papers · 3.8× the field average
- Impact
- Top 10% most cited in its field
- References
- 29 works
- Access
- Paywalled
- Research areas
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Keywords
- Red meat, Processed meat, Medicine, Confidence interval, Meta-analysis, Relative risk, Prospective cohort study, Food science, Internal medicine, Biology, Pathology
- MeSH
- animals, cattle, swine, humans, diet, models, statistical, risk, meat, meat products, united states, china, europe
2 authors
From SE
- Susanna C. Larsson · correspondingKarolinska Institutet
- Nicola Orsini
Abstract
High consumption of red meat and processed meat has been associated with increased risk of several chronic diseases. We conducted a meta-analysis to summarize the evidence from prospective studies on red meat and processed meat consumption in relationship to all-cause mortality. Pertinent studies were identified by searching PubMed through May 2013 and by reviewing the reference lists of retrieved articles. Prospective studies that reported relative risks with 95% confidence intervals for the association of red meat or processed meat consumption with all-cause mortality were eligible. Study-specific results were combined by using a random-effects model. Nine prospective studies were included in the meta-analysis. The summary relative risks of all-cause mortality for the highest versus the lowest category of consumption were 1.10 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98, 1.22; n = 6 studies) for unprocessed red meat, 1.23 (95% CI: 1.17, 1.28; n = 6 studies) for processed meat, and 1.29 (95% CI: 1.24, 1.35; n = 5 studies) for total red meat. In a dose-response meta-analysis, consumption of processed meat and total red meat, but not unprocessed red meat, was statistically significantly positively associated with all-cause mortality in a nonlinear fashion. These results indicate that high consumption of red meat, especially processed meat, may increase all-cause mortality.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.