Study2013Open access

Nut consumption and risk of pancreatic cancer in women

Bao Y, Hu FB, Giovannucci EL, Wolpin BM, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Fuchs CS

British journal of cancer · 35 citations

How it was studied

Design
Cohort study (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
University or hospital
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Government
National Institutes of Health
Government
National Cancer Institute
Government
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Government
NCI NIH HHS
Government
NIDDK NIH HHS
Grants
National Cancer Institute (U54CA155626); National Cancer Institute (K07-CA140790); National Cancer Institute (1U54 CA155626-01); National Cancer Institute (P01 CA087969); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T-32 DK 007703); National Cancer Institute (R01CA124908); National Institutes of Health (1u54ca155626-01); National Cancer Institute ([P01 CA87969); National Institutes of Health (P01 CA 87969); National Institutes of Health (R01 CA124908); National Institutes of Health (1U54CA155626); National Institutes of Health (CA 87969)

Based on 6 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2013-10-22 · Br J Cancer · vol. 109 · issue 11 · pp. 2911–2916
Publisher
Springer Nature
Cited
62 citations · more than 93% of similar papers · 3.5× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
42 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY-NC-SA
Research areas
Nuts composition and effects · Oral Health Pathology and Treatment · Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
Keywords
Medicine, Pancreatic cancer, Body mass index, Prospective cohort study, Relative risk, Diabetes mellitus, Risk factor, Cancer, Confidence interval, Internal medicine, Cohort study, Nut, Proportional hazards model, Cohort, Surgery, Endocrinology
MeSH
humans, nuts, pancreatic neoplasms, diet surveys, risk factors, feeding behavior, eating, adult, aged, middle aged, united states, female, surveys and questionnaires

7 authors

From US

  • Ying Bao · correspondingBrigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
  • Frank B. HuBrigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
  • Edward L. GiovannucciBrigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
  • Brian Matthew WolpinBrigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • Meir J. StampferBrigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
  • Walter Churchill WillettBrigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University

Abstract

Background

Increasing nut intake has been associated with reduced risk of diabetes mellitus, which is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer.

Methods

We prospectively followed 75 680 women in the Nurses' Health Study, and examined the association between nut consumption and pancreatic cancer risk. Participants with a previous history of cancer were excluded. Nut consumption was assessed at baseline and updated every 2 to 4 years. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

We documented 466 incident cases of pancreatic cancer. After adjusting for age, height, smoking, physical activity, and total energy intake, women who consumed a 28-g (1 oz) serving size of nuts ≥2 times per week experienced a significantly lower risk of pancreatic cancer (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.92; P for trend=0.007) when compared with those who largely abstained from nuts. The results did not appreciably change after further adjustment for body mass index (BMI) and history of diabetes mellitus (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48-0.95; P for trend=0.01). The inverse association persisted within strata defined by BMI, physical activity, smoking, and intakes of red meat, fruits, and vegetables.

Conclusion

Frequent nut consumption is inversely associated with risk of pancreatic cancer in this large prospective cohort of women, independent of other potential risk factors for pancreatic cancer.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY-NC-SA).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.