Effects of music interventions on emotional States and running performance
Lane AM, Davis PA, Devonport TJ
Journal of sports science & medicine · 15 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Randomized controlled trial (classified by our AI screen)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Health markers and function
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2011-01-01 · J Sports Sci Med · vol. 10 · issue 2 · pp. 400–7
- Publisher
- National Institutes of Health
- Cited
- 49 citations · more than 92% of similar papers · 3.7× the field average
- Impact
- Top 10% most cited in its field
- References
- 39 works
- Access
- Open access (repository copy)
- Research areas
- Sport Psychology and Performance · Neuroscience and Music Perception · Diverse Music Education Insights
- Keywords
- Psychological intervention, Intervention (counseling), Psychology, Athletes, Applied psychology, Rhythm, Medicine, Physical therapy, Psychiatry
3 authors
From GB, RS
- Andrew M. LaneUniversity of Wolverhampton
- Paul DavisCenter for Health, Exercise and Sport Sciences
- Tracey Jayne Devonport
Abstract
The present study compared the effects of two different music interventions on changes in emotional states before and during running, and also explored effects of music interventions upon performance outcome. Volunteer participants (n = 65) who regularly listened to music when running registered online to participate in a three-stage study. Participants attempted to attain a personally important running goal to establish baseline performance. Thereafter, participants were randomly assigned to either a self-selected music group or an Audiofuel music group. Audiofuel produce pieces of music designed to assist synchronous running. The self-selected music group followed guidelines for selecting motivating playlists. In both experimental groups, participants used the Brunel Music Rating Inventory-2 (BMRI-2) to facilitate selection of motivational music. Participants again completed the BMRI-2 post- intervention to assess the motivational qualities of Audiofuel music or the music they selected for use during the study. Results revealed no significant differences between self-selected music and Audiofuel music on all variables analyzed. Participants in both music groups reported increased pleasant emotions and decreased unpleasant emotions following intervention. Significant performance improvements were demonstrated post-intervention with participants reporting a belief that emotional states related to performance. Further analysis indicated that enhanced performance was significantly greater among participants reporting music to be motivational as indicated by high scores on the BMRI-2. Findings suggest that both individual athletes and practitioners should consider using the BMRI-2 when selecting music for running. Key pointsListening to music with a high motivational quotient as indicated by scores on the BMRI-2 was associated with enhanced running performance and meta-emotional beliefs that emotions experienced during running helped performance.Beliefs on the effectiveness of music intended to alter emotions were associated with high scores on the BMRI-2.Runners seeking to use music as an emotion regulating strategy should consider using the BMRI-2 as an effective means by which to identify potentially motivating tracks.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.