Cruciferous vegetables and risk of colorectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Tse G, Eslick GD
Nutrition and cancer · 88 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Clinical events such as disease or death
- Intake measured by
- Not stated
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2013-12-16 · Nutr Cancer · vol. 66 · issue 1 · pp. 128–139
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Cited
- 134 citations · more than 68% of similar papers · 0.9× the field average
- References
- 60 works
- Access
- Paywalled
- Research areas
- Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress · Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms · Nitrogen and Sulfur Effects on Brassica
- Keywords
- Cruciferous vegetables, Colorectal cancer, Confidence interval, Medicine, Odds ratio, Meta-analysis, Genotype, Internal medicine, Biology, Cancer, Genetics
- MeSH
- animals, humans, brassicaceae, brassica, vegetables, colorectal neoplasms, disease models, animal, glutathione transferase, risk factors, feeding behavior, genotype, polymorphism, genetic, gene-environment interaction, observational studies as topic
2 authors
From AU
- Genevieve TseNepean Hospital
- Guy D. EslickThe University of Sydney
Abstract
Evidence shows cruciferous vegetables exhibit chemoprotective properties, commonly attributed to their rich source of isothiocyanates. However, epidemiological data examining the association between cruciferous vegetable intake and colorectal neoplasms have been inconclusive. This meta-analysis examines the epidemiological evidence to characterize the association between cruciferous vegetable intake and risk of developing colorectal neoplasms. Thirty-three articles were included in the meta-analysis after a literature search of electronic databases. Subgroup analysis for individual cruciferae types (n = 8 studies) and GST polymorphism (n = 8 studies) were performed. Pooled adjusted odds ratios (ORs) comparing highest and lowest categories of dietary pattern scores were calculated. Results show a statistically significant inverse association between cruciferous vegetable intake and colon cancer [OR = 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72-0.98; P value heterogeneity < 0.001]. Broccoli in particular exhibited protective benefits against colorectal (CRC) neoplasms (OR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.65-0.99; P value heterogeneity = 0.02). Stratification by GST genotype reveals that the GSTT1 null genotype confers a reduction in CRC risk (OR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.64-0.95; P value heterogeneity = 0.32). This study provides support to the hypothesis that cruciferous vegetable intake protects against cancer of the colon. This study also demonstrates the significance of gene-diet interactions and the importance of assessing individual cruciferous vegetables.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.