Meta-analysis2014

Cruciferous vegetables and risk of colorectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tse G, Eslick GD

Nutrition and cancer · 88 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2013-12-16 · Nutr Cancer · vol. 66 · issue 1 · pp. 128–139
Publisher
Routledge
Cited
134 citations · more than 68% of similar papers · 0.9× the field average
References
60 works
Access
Paywalled
Research areas
Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress · Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms · Nitrogen and Sulfur Effects on Brassica
Keywords
Cruciferous vegetables, Colorectal cancer, Confidence interval, Medicine, Odds ratio, Meta-analysis, Genotype, Internal medicine, Biology, Cancer, Genetics
MeSH
animals, humans, brassicaceae, brassica, vegetables, colorectal neoplasms, disease models, animal, glutathione transferase, risk factors, feeding behavior, genotype, polymorphism, genetic, gene-environment interaction, observational studies as topic

2 authors

From AU

  • Genevieve TseNepean Hospital
  • Guy D. EslickThe University of Sydney

Abstract

Evidence shows cruciferous vegetables exhibit chemoprotective properties, commonly attributed to their rich source of isothiocyanates. However, epidemiological data examining the association between cruciferous vegetable intake and colorectal neoplasms have been inconclusive. This meta-analysis examines the epidemiological evidence to characterize the association between cruciferous vegetable intake and risk of developing colorectal neoplasms. Thirty-three articles were included in the meta-analysis after a literature search of electronic databases. Subgroup analysis for individual cruciferae types (n = 8 studies) and GST polymorphism (n = 8 studies) were performed. Pooled adjusted odds ratios (ORs) comparing highest and lowest categories of dietary pattern scores were calculated. Results show a statistically significant inverse association between cruciferous vegetable intake and colon cancer [OR = 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72-0.98; P value heterogeneity < 0.001]. Broccoli in particular exhibited protective benefits against colorectal (CRC) neoplasms (OR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.65-0.99; P value heterogeneity = 0.02). Stratification by GST genotype reveals that the GSTT1 null genotype confers a reduction in CRC risk (OR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.64-0.95; P value heterogeneity = 0.32). This study provides support to the hypothesis that cruciferous vegetable intake protects against cancer of the colon. This study also demonstrates the significance of gene-diet interactions and the importance of assessing individual cruciferous vegetables.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.