Randomized controlled trial2014

Strength training adaptations after cold-water immersion

Fröhlich M, Faude O, Klein M, Pieter A, Emrich E, Meyer T

Journal of strength and conditioning research · 48 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2014-02-19 · J Strength Cond Res · vol. 28 · issue 9 · pp. 2628–2633
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Cited
80 citations · more than 95% of similar papers · 4.5× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
45 works
Access
Paywalled
Research areas
Sports Performance and Training · Sports injuries and prevention · Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
Medicine, Immersion (mathematics), Physical therapy, Leg press, Strength training, Psychology, Muscle strength, Animal science, Mathematics, Biology
MeSH
leg, muscle, skeletal, humans, water, exercise, pilot projects, immersion, adaptation, physiological, rest, adult, male, muscle strength, cold temperature, resistance training, young adult

6 authors

From DE, CH

  • Michael Fröhlich · correspondingSaarland University
  • Oliver FaudeUniversity of Basel
  • Markus KleinSaarland University
  • Andrea PieterDeutsche Hochschule für Prävention und Gesundheitsmanagement
  • Eike EmrichSaarland University
  • Tim MeyerSaarland University

Abstract

Several studies analyzed the effectiveness of cold-water immersion (CWI) to support recovery after strenuous exercise, but the overall results seem to be conflicting. Most of these studies analyzed only short-term recovery effects, whereas the adaptational aspect has been widely neglected. Therefore, we analyzed the effects of repeated cooling after training sessions (CWI) on adaptations to strength training. Seventeen trained male students volunteered the study. After a 2-week familiarization period, a pretest (T1) of 1 repetition maximum (RM) and 12RM was conducted followed by the 5-week strength training period (within-subject design). After the posttest (T2) and a 2-week detraining period, a retention test (T3) was carried out. Directly after each training session, CWI was applied for 1 randomly assigned leg. Cooling consisted of 3 4-minute intervals with a 30-second rest period. The other leg was not cooled. A significant increase in 1RM and 12RM from baseline to T2 and T3 (p < 0.001), respectively, and a further significant increase in 12RM from T2 to T3 (p ≤ 0.05) were observed. In addition, a tendency for a large leg effect with higher values for the "control leg" in both parameters (p = 0.08 each) and a moderate time × leg interaction in favor of the control leg was found (1RM: p = 0.11; 12RM: p = 0.09). The percentage change differences between both conditions were 1.6% for the increase in 1RM from T1 to T2 and 2.0% from T1 to T3 in favor of the control leg. Long-term strength training adaptations in trained subjects can be negatively affected by CWI. However, effects were small, and the practical relevance relative to possible recovery effects needs to be considered in a sports practical setting.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.