Randomized controlled trial2014

Efficacy of lycopene-enriched virgin olive oil for treating burning mouth syndrome: a double-blind randomised

Cano-Carrillo P, Pons-Fuster A, López-Jornet P

Journal of oral rehabilitation · 28 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2014-02-26 · J Oral Rehabil · vol. 41 · issue 4 · pp. 296–305
Publisher
Wiley
Cited
47 citations · more than 88% of similar papers · 2.3× the field average
References
47 works
Access
Paywalled
Research areas
Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions · Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques · Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
Double blind, Olive oil, Medicine, Burning mouth syndrome, Single blind, Food science, Traditional medicine, Dentistry, Chemistry, Randomized controlled trial, Internal medicine, Placebo
MeSH
humans, burning mouth syndrome, carotenoids, plant oils, pain measurement, treatment outcome, administration, topical, double-blind method, quality of life, aged, middle aged, female, male, olive oil, surveys and questionnaires, lycopene

3 authors

From ES

  • P. Cano‐CarrilloHospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer; Universidad de Murcia
  • Alvaro Pons‐FusterHospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer; Universidad de Murcia
  • Pía López‐Jornet · correspondingHospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer; Universidad de Murcia

Abstract

Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is an intensive chronic oral mucosal pain condition of unknown aetiology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of lycopene-enriched virgin olive oil used to treat the condition, comparing this with a placebo. This study took the form of a double-bind, randomised clinical trial. A total of 60 patients with BMS were randomly divided into two groups: Group I (n = 30) treated with lycopene-enriched virgin olive oil (300 ppm) (1.5 mL three times a day) and Group II (n=treated with a placebo (1.5 mL three times a day). Evaluations were made before and after 12 weeks of product/placebo application. Symptoms were evaluated by VAS, whilst patient psychological profiles were assessed using the HAD scale and patient quality of life using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) and the Medical Outcome Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF36). Fifty patients completed the 12-week treatment (26 in Group I and 24 in Group II). Visual analogue scale pain values improved in both groups but without statistically significant differences between the groups (P = 0.57). Oral quality of life also improved. Four patients in Group I (treatment) left the study and six left Group II (placebo). No patients experienced any adverse effects resulting from treatment at any of the evaluation times. Patients were lost from the sample due to lack of compliance. It was found that the lipid profile did not change during the 3-month study period as a result of the application of lycopene-enriched olive oil (Group I); nor did any change occur in the placebo group (Group II). In this way, the placebo effect was seen to be strong. The topical lycopene-enriched virgin olive oil is a very safe and an effective similar way that the placebo for treating patients with BMS. However, future studies are required to establish the treatment for patients with chronic and painful syndrome.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.