Case report2014

A case of tick-bite-induced red meat allergy

Wuerdeman MF, Harrison JM

Military medicine · 11 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Case report (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2014-04-01 · Mil Med · vol. 179 · issue 4 · pp. e473–e475
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Cited
18 citations · more than 60% of similar papers · 0.3× the field average
References
4 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research · Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization · Occupational exposure and asthma
Keywords
Amblyomma americanum, Tick, Medicine, Allergy, Immunology, Environmental health, Dermatology, Veterinary medicine
MeSH
humans, food hypersensitivity, diagnosis, differential, biopsy, adult, male, tick bites

2 authors

  • Marc F. Wuerdeman
  • Joshua M. Harrison

Abstract

Delayed hypersensitivity disorders and food allergies are often challenging for the clinician and patient alike. A recent discovery of an IgE antibody specific to galactose-α-1,3-galactose, which is a carbohydrate abundantly expressed on cells and tissues of beef, pork, and lamb, adds one more tool to aid the clinician in making the appropriate diagnosis. A link has been discovered between the bite of the Lone Star Tick (Amblyomma americanum) and the development of sensitivity to galactose-α-1,3-galactose. With a high prevalence of Lone Star Tick populations inhabiting major U.S. Army Installations, and the type of duty required by our Service members, it could potentially affect susceptible individuals. We describe a case of an active duty soldier who went 4 years searching for this elusive diagnosis and connection and discuss why it should remain in the differential diagnosis when treating military health care beneficiaries.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.