Meta-analysis2014

Is there a relationship between red or processed meat intake and obesity? A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Rouhani MH, Salehi-Abargouei A, Surkan PJ, Azadbakht L

Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 200 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2014-05-12 · Obes Rev · vol. 15 · issue 9 · pp. 740–748
Publisher
Wiley
Cited
309 citations · more than 89% of similar papers · 2.4× the field average
References
42 works
Access
Paywalled
Research areas
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Meat and Animal Product Quality · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
Meta-analysis, Red meat, Obesity, Waist, Observational study, Medicine, Odds ratio, Body mass index, Publication bias, Food science, Internal medicine, Biology, Pathology
MeSH
humans, coronary disease, obesity, body mass index, diet, risk factors, feeding behavior, meat, meat products, waist circumference, observational studies as topic

4 authors

From IR, US

  • Mohammad Hossein RouhaniIsfahan University of Medical Sciences
  • Amin Salehi‐AbargoueiIsfahan University of Medical Sciences
  • Pamela Jean SurkanJohns Hopkins University
  • Leila Azadbakht · correspondingIsfahan University of Medical Sciences

Abstract

A body of literature exists regarding the association of red and processed meats with obesity; however, the nature and extent of this relation has not been clearly established. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between red and processed meat intake and obesity. We searched multiple electronic databases for observational studies on the relationship between red and processed meat intake and obesity published until July 2013. Odds ratios (ORs) and means for obesity-related indices and for variables that may contribute to heterogeneity were calculated. A systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted with 21 and 18 studies, respectively (n = 1,135,661). The meta-analysis (n = 113,477) showed that consumption of higher quantities of red and processed meats was a risk factor for obesity (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.14-1.64). Pooled mean body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) trends showed that in comparison to those in the lowest ntile, subjects in the highest ntile of red and processed meat consumption had higher BMI (mean difference: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.90-1.84 for red meat; mean difference: 1.32; 95% CI: 0.64-2.00 for processed meat) and WC (mean difference: 2.79; 95% CI: 1.86-3.70 for red meat; mean difference: 2.77; 95% CI: 1.87-2.66 for processed meat). The current analysis revealed that red and processed meat intake is directly associated with risk of obesity, and higher BMI and WC. However, the heterogeneity among studies is significant. These findings suggest a decrease in red and processed meat intake.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.