Is there a relationship between red or processed meat intake and obesity? A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
Rouhani MH, Salehi-Abargouei A, Surkan PJ, Azadbakht L
Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 200 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Health markers and function
- Intake measured by
- Not stated
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2014-05-12 · Obes Rev · vol. 15 · issue 9 · pp. 740–748
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Cited
- 309 citations · more than 89% of similar papers · 2.4× the field average
- References
- 42 works
- Access
- Paywalled
- Research areas
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Meat and Animal Product Quality · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Keywords
- Meta-analysis, Red meat, Obesity, Waist, Observational study, Medicine, Odds ratio, Body mass index, Publication bias, Food science, Internal medicine, Biology, Pathology
- MeSH
- humans, coronary disease, obesity, body mass index, diet, risk factors, feeding behavior, meat, meat products, waist circumference, observational studies as topic
4 authors
From IR, US
- Mohammad Hossein RouhaniIsfahan University of Medical Sciences
- Amin Salehi‐AbargoueiIsfahan University of Medical Sciences
- Pamela Jean SurkanJohns Hopkins University
- Leila Azadbakht · correspondingIsfahan University of Medical Sciences
Abstract
A body of literature exists regarding the association of red and processed meats with obesity; however, the nature and extent of this relation has not been clearly established. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between red and processed meat intake and obesity. We searched multiple electronic databases for observational studies on the relationship between red and processed meat intake and obesity published until July 2013. Odds ratios (ORs) and means for obesity-related indices and for variables that may contribute to heterogeneity were calculated. A systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted with 21 and 18 studies, respectively (n = 1,135,661). The meta-analysis (n = 113,477) showed that consumption of higher quantities of red and processed meats was a risk factor for obesity (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.14-1.64). Pooled mean body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) trends showed that in comparison to those in the lowest ntile, subjects in the highest ntile of red and processed meat consumption had higher BMI (mean difference: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.90-1.84 for red meat; mean difference: 1.32; 95% CI: 0.64-2.00 for processed meat) and WC (mean difference: 2.79; 95% CI: 1.86-3.70 for red meat; mean difference: 2.77; 95% CI: 1.87-2.66 for processed meat). The current analysis revealed that red and processed meat intake is directly associated with risk of obesity, and higher BMI and WC. However, the heterogeneity among studies is significant. These findings suggest a decrease in red and processed meat intake.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.