Cohort study2015

A case-control study on red meat consumption and risk of stroke among a group of Iranian adults

Saneei P, Saadatnia M, Shakeri F, Beykverdi M, Keshteli AH, Esmaillzadeh A

Public health nutrition · 8 citations

Review labels

Food frequency questionnaireLumps processed with unprocessed meat

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Cohort study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Food frequency questionnaire

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
University or hospital
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
University or hospital
Food Security Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Based on 2 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2014-06-13 · Public Health Nutr · vol. 18 · issue 6 · pp. 1084–1090
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Cited
12 citations · more than 67% of similar papers · 0.3× the field average
References
26 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Meat and Animal Product Quality · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Keywords
Medicine, Red meat, Stroke (engine), Odds ratio, Diabetes mellitus, Case-control study, Neurology, Odds, Internal medicine, Environmental health, Logistic regression, Endocrinology
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, liver, kidney, heart, animals, cattle, sheep, domestic, humans, prevalence, risk factors, case-control studies, prospective studies, meat, meat products, aged, aged, 80 and over, middle aged, iran, female, male, stroke, elder nutritional physiological phenomena

6 authors

From IR, CA

  • Parvane SaneeiIsfahan University of Medical Sciences
  • Mohammad SaadatniaIsfahan University of Medical Sciences
  • Forough ShakeriIsfahan University of Medical Sciences
  • Masumeh BeykverdiIsfahan University of Medical Sciences
  • Ammar Hassanzadeh KeshteliIsfahan University of Medical Sciences; University of Alberta
  • Ahmad Esmaillzadeh · correspondingIsfahan University of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Objective

We aimed to examine the association between red meat consumption and stroke in a group of Iranian adults.

Design

A hospital-based case-control study.

Setting

The study included stroke patients and hospital-based controls. Usual dietary intakes of participants were assessed by means of a validated 168-item semi-quantitative FFQ. Total red meat consumption was calculated by summing up the consumption of red, processed and visceral meats.

Subjects

One hundred and ninety-five cases were stroke patients hospitalized in the neurology ward and 195 controls were recruited from patients hospitalized in other wards with no history of cerebrovascular diseases or neurological disorders.

Results

Participants with stroke were older, more likely to be male and less likely to be obese. Individuals in the highest tertile of red meat intake were 119 % more likely to have stroke (OR=2·19; 95% CI 1·33, 3·60) compared with those in the lowest tertile. After controlling for age, sex and total energy intake, the association between red meat consumption and stroke was strengthened (OR=2·72; 95% CI 1·53, 4·83). This association remained significant even after further controlling for physical activity and smoking as well as dietary intakes. Additional adjustments for BMI, diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia did not influence the association significantly (OR=2·51; 95 % CI 1·19, 5·09).

Conclusions

Consumption of red meat was associated with greater odds of having stroke in a group of Iranian adults.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.