Study2014

Red and processed meat intake and risk of bladder cancer: a meta-analysis

Li F, An S, Hou L, Chen P, Lei C, Tan W

International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 32 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2014-01-01 · Int J Clin Exp Med · vol. 7 · issue 8 · pp. 2100–10
Publisher
National Institutes of Health
Cited
37 citations · more than 64% of similar papers · 0.9× the field average
References
30 works
Access
Open access (repository copy)
Research areas
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Keywords
Red meat, Medicine, Bladder cancer, Processed meat, Meta-analysis, Cancer, Relative risk, Environmental health, Food science, Internal medicine, Confidence interval, Pathology, Biology

6 authors

From CN

  • Fei Ran LiSouthern Medical University
  • Shengli AnSouthern Medical University
  • Lina HouSouthern Medical University
  • Pengliang ChenSouthern Medical University
  • Chengyong LeiSouthern Medical University
  • Wanlong TanSouthern Medical University

Abstract

Findings from epidemiologic studies concerning red and processed meat intake and bladder cancer risk remain conflicting. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis to examine the associations of red and processed meat intake with bladder cancer. Eligible studies published up to May 2014 were retrieved via both computer searches and review of references. Finally, we identified 14 studies on red meat (involving 9,084 cases) and 11 studies on processed meat (7,562 cases) involving up to 1,558,848 individuals. Random-effects models were used to estimate summary relative risk estimates (SRRE) based on high vs. low intake, and heterogeneity between study results was explored through stratified analyses on the basis of red/processed meat category, gender, study design and geographical region. Overall, the SRRE for all studies regarding red meat intake was 1.15 (95% CI: 0.97-1.36). Significant positive association was observed between processed meat consumption and bladder cancer (SRRE = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.04-1.43). Interestingly, increased by 25% and 33% risk of bladder cancer were observed for red meat and processed meat intake respectively in populations from the American continent. In conclusion, our fi ndings showed that there was an absence of an association between red meat intake and bladder cancer, but suggested that high consumption of processed meat probably correlated with rising risk of bladder cancer. In addition, positive relationships were observed regarding people intake of red and processed meat in the American continent. These findings need to be confirmed in future research.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.