Randomized controlled trial2014

Sulforaphane treatment of autism spectrum disorder (ASD)

Singh K, Connors SL, Macklin EA, Smith KD, Fahey JW, Talalay P, Zimmerman AW

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 312 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2014-10-13 · Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A · vol. 111 · issue 43 · pp. 15550–15555
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences
Cited
462 citations · more than 100% of similar papers · 15.7× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
41 works
Access
Open access (repository copy)
Research areas
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research · Nuclear Receptors and Signaling · Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
Autism spectrum disorder, Sulforaphane, Spectrum (functional analysis), Autism, Psychology, Medicine, Psychiatry, Physics, Cancer research
MeSH
humans, isothiocyanates, sulfoxides, placebos, treatment outcome, social behavior, child development disorders, pervasive, adolescent, adult, male, young adult

7 authors

From US

  • Kanwaljit SinghHarvard University; University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School; Massachusetts General Hospital; Center for Autism and Related Disorders
  • Susan L. ConnorsHarvard University; Massachusetts General Hospital; Center for Autism and Related Disorders
  • Eric A. MacklinHarvard University; Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Kirby D. Smith
  • Jed W. FaheyJohns Hopkins University; Johns Hopkins Medicine
  • Paul TalalayJohns Hopkins University; Johns Hopkins Medicine

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD), characterized by both impaired communication and social interaction, and by stereotypic behavior, affects about 1 in 68, predominantly males. The medico-economic burdens of ASD are enormous, and no recognized treatment targets the core features of ASD. In a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial, young men (aged 13-27) with moderate to severe ASD received the phytochemical sulforaphane (n = 29)--derived from broccoli sprout extracts--or indistinguishable placebo (n = 15). The effects on behavior of daily oral doses of sulforaphane (50-150 µmol) for 18 wk, followed by 4 wk without treatment, were quantified by three widely accepted behavioral measures completed by parents/caregivers and physicians: the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC), Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), and Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (CGI-I). Initial scores for ABC and SRS were closely matched for participants assigned to placebo and sulforaphane. After 18 wk, participants receiving placebo experienced minimal change (<3.3%), whereas those receiving sulforaphane showed substantial declines (improvement of behavior): 34% for ABC (P < 0.001, comparing treatments) and 17% for SRS scores (P = 0.017). On CGI-I, a significantly greater number of participants receiving sulforaphane had improvement in social interaction, abnormal behavior, and verbal communication (P = 0.015-0.007). Upon discontinuation of sulforaphane, total scores on all scales rose toward pretreatment levels. Dietary sulforaphane, of recognized low toxicity, was selected for its capacity to reverse abnormalities that have been associated with ASD, including oxidative stress and lower antioxidant capacity, depressed glutathione synthesis, reduced mitochondrial function and oxidative phosphorylation, increased lipid peroxidation, and neuroinflammmation.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.