Randomized controlled trial2015

Effect of creatine monohydrate on clinical progression in patients with Parkinson disease: a randomized clinical trial

Writing Group for the NINDS Exploratory Trials in Parkinson Disease (NET-PD) Investigators, Kieburtz K, Tilley BC, Elm JJ, Babcock D, Hauser R, Ross GW, Augustine AH, Augustine EU, Aminoff MJ, Bodis-Wollner IG, Boyd J, Cambi F, Chou K, Christine CW, Cines M, Dahodwala N, Derwent L, Dewey RB, Hawthorne K, Houghton DJ, Kamp C, Leehey M, Lew MF, Liang GS, Luo ST, Mari Z, Morgan JC, Parashos S, Pérez A, Petrovitch H, Rajan S, Reichwein S, Roth JT, Schneider JS, Shannon KM, Simon DK, Simuni T, Singer C, Sudarsky L, Tanner CM, Umeh CC, Williams K, Wills AM

JAMA · 180 citations

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
National Institute on Aging
Government
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Government
National Center for Research Resources
Government
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Government
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Government
NINDS NIH HHS
Government
NIMHD NIH HHS
Government
NIA NIH HHS
Government
NCATS NIH HHS
Government
NCRR NIH HHS
Grants
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U10 NS044504); National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K-12NS 066098); National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1 TR000433); National Center for Research Resources (UL1 RR 025758); National Institute on Aging (K23AG034236); National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P50NS091856); National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K23 NS072283); National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U10 NS044545); National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01 NS43128); National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01NS 043128); National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R24 MD001779); National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS44504-08); National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U10 NS044460)

Based on 10 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2015-02-10 · JAMA · vol. 313 · issue 6 · p. 584
Publisher
American Medical Association
Cited
242 citations · more than 100% of similar papers · 18.9× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
32 works
Access
Open access (repository copy)
Research areas
Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments · Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
Medicine, Physical therapy, Randomized controlled trial, Clinical trial, Placebo, Ambulatory, Creatine, Internal medicine, Pediatrics, Alternative medicine, Pathology
MeSH
humans, parkinson disease, disease progression, creatine, antiparkinson agents, treatment outcome, drug therapy, combination, follow-up studies, double-blind method, aged, middle aged, female, male, medication adherence

43 authors

From US, CA

  • Karl Kieburtz · correspondingUniversity of Rochester
  • Barbara C. TilleyThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
  • Jordan J. ElmMedical University of South Carolina
  • Debra BabcockNational Institutes of Health
  • Robert A. HauserUniversity of South Florida
  • G. Webster RossPacific Health Research and Education Institute

Abstract

Importance

There are no treatments available to slow or prevent the progression of Parkinson disease, despite its global prevalence and significant health care burden. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Exploratory Trials in Parkinson Disease program was established to promote discovery of potential therapies.

Objective

To determine whether creatine monohydrate was more effective than placebo in slowing long-term clinical decline in participants with Parkinson disease.

Design, setting, and patients

The Long-term Study 1, a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, 1:1 randomized efficacy trial. Participants were recruited from 45 investigative sites in the United States and Canada and included 1741 men and women with early (within 5 years of diagnosis) and treated (receiving dopaminergic therapy) Parkinson disease. Participants were enrolled from March 2007 to May 2010 and followed up until September 2013.

Interventions

Participants were randomized to placebo or creatine (10 g/d) monohydrate for a minimum of 5 years (maximum follow-up, 8 years).

Main outcomes and measures

The primary outcome measure was a difference in clinical decline from baseline to 5-year follow-up, compared between the 2 treatment groups using a global statistical test. Clinical status was defined by 5 outcome measures: Modified Rankin Scale, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, PDQ-39 Summary Index, Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living scale, and ambulatory capacity. All outcomes were coded such that higher scores indicated worse outcomes and were analyzed by a global statistical test. Higher summed ranks (range, 5-4775) indicate worse outcomes.

Results

The trial was terminated early for futility based on results of a planned interim analysis of participants enrolled at least 5 years prior to the date of the analysis (n = 955). The median follow-up time was 4 years. Of the 955 participants, the mean of the summed ranks for placebo was 2360 (95% CI, 2249-2470) and for creatine was 2414 (95% CI, 2304-2524). The global statistical test yielded t1865.8 = -0.75 (2-sided P = .45). There were no detectable differences (P < .01 to partially adjust for multiple comparisons) in adverse and serious adverse events by body system.

Conclusions and relevance

Among patients with early and treated Parkinson disease, treatment with creatine monohydrate for at least 5 years, compared with placebo did not improve clinical outcomes. These findings do not support the use of creatine monohydrate in patients with Parkinson disease.

Trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00449865.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.