Cross-sectional study2015

Magnesium intake and depression in adults

Tarleton EK, Littenberg B

Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 60 citations

How it was studied

Design
Cross-sectional study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
University or hospital
University of Vermont

Based on 1 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2015-03-01 · J Am Board Fam Med · vol. 28 · issue 2 · pp. 249–256
Publisher
American Board of Family Medicine
Cited
95 citations · more than 97% of similar papers · 6.8× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
94 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Magnesium in Health and Disease · Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments · Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals
Keywords
Medicine, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Depression (economics), Confounding, Confidence interval, Magnesium, Population, Logistic regression, Relative risk, Internal medicine, Cross-sectional study, Environmental health
MeSH
humans, magnesium, nutrition surveys, incidence, risk factors, retrospective studies, cross-sectional studies, depression, dietary supplements, adult, aged, middle aged, vermont, female, male

2 authors

From US

  • Emily K. TarletonUniversity of Vermont; University of Vermont Medical Center
  • Benjamin LittenbergUniversity of Vermont; University of Vermont Medical Center

Abstract

Background

Depression is a common and often disabling disorder. Magnesium supplementation has been linked to improvement in depressive symptoms, but consensus on the relationship between magnesium and depression has not been reached.

Methods

The purpose of this study was to test the existence of an association between dietary magnesium intake and depression in the adult US population. A cross-sectional, population-based data set (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) was used to explore the relationship of magnesium intake and depression in 8894 US adults (mean age, 46.1 years; 47.4% men) from 2007 to 2010. Using logistic regression to model the relationship between the presence of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire score ≥5) and low magnesium intake (<184 mg/day), we examined the risk ratio (RR) of magnesium intake and its 95% confidence interval.

Results

After adjusting for all potential confounders, the strength of the association of very low magnesium intake with depression was statistically significant (RR = 1.16; 95% CI, 1.06-1.30). Adjusting for all other covariates, low magnesium intake was associated with depression in subjects younger than age 65 (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06-1.40; P = .007) but seemed to be protective in seniors (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.56-0.98; P = .032).

Conclusions

We found a significant association between very low magnesium intake and depression, especially in younger adults. The finding of the potential protective effect of low magnesium intake in older adults is surprising and warrants further investigation.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.