Randomized controlled trial2015Open access

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effects of caffeine and L-theanine both alone and in combination on cerebral blood flow, cognition and mood

Dodd FL, Kennedy DO, Riby LM, Haskell-Ramsay CF

Psychopharmacology · 65 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2015-03-11 · Psychopharmacology (Berl) · vol. 232 · issue 14 · pp. 2563–2576
Publisher
Springer Science+Business Media
Cited
101 citations · more than 98% of similar papers · 8.6× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
72 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Coffee research and impacts · Tea Polyphenols and Effects · Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine
Keywords
Caffeine, Theanine, Placebo, Mood, Crossover study, Cerebral blood flow, Psychology, Pharmacology, Cognition, Anesthesia, Chemistry, Medicine, Clinical psychology, Psychiatry, Green tea, Food science
MeSH
humans, caffeine, glutamates, hemoglobins, oxyhemoglobins, central nervous system stimulants, spectroscopy, near-infrared, cross-over studies, double-blind method, affect, cognition, psychomotor performance, attention, reaction time, cerebrovascular circulation, vasoconstriction, adolescent, adult, female, male, hemodynamics, young adult

4 authors

From GB

  • Fiona L. DoddNorthumbria University
  • David Opare KENNEDYNorthumbria University
  • Leigh M. RibyNorthumbria University
  • Crystal F. Haskell‐Ramsay · correspondingNorthumbria University

Abstract

Rationale

Evidence suggests interactive effects of the tea components caffeine and L-theanine on behaviour, yet no data exists exploring the impact of the two on cerebral blood flow (CBF).

Objectives

The current placebo-controlled, double-blind, counterbalanced, crossover study examined the effects of caffeine and L-theanine on CBF and extended previous cognitive and mood findings by using lower doses than previous studies of a similar methodology, which more closely reflect the ratios present in tea.

Methods

Twelve habitual consumers and 12 non-habitual consumers of caffeine each received 75 mg caffeine, 50 mg L-theanine, 75 mg caffeine plus 50 mg L-theanine, and placebo in a counterbalanced order across four separate visits. CBF was measured via near-infrared spectroscopy with cognition and mood assessed at baseline and 30 min post-dose. Salivary caffeine and peripheral haemodynamics were co-monitored.

Results

Caffeine reduced oxygenated haemoglobin (oxy-Hb), increased deoxygenated haemoglobin (deoxy-Hb), improved performance on attention tasks and increased overall mood ratings. Increases in deoxy-Hb following caffeine were more pronounced in non-consumers. Some evidence for increased deoxy-Hb remained when caffeine was combined with L-theanine, but this effect was attenuated and the effects of caffeine on oxy-Hb, cognition and mood were eradicated.

Conclusions

Combining L-theanine with caffeine, at levels and ratios equivalent to one to two cups of tea, eliminated the vasoconstrictive effect and behavioural effects of caffeine. This supports previous findings of an interaction between these substances, despite a lack of effects of L-theanine in isolation. However, at the levels tested here, this did not lead to a positive impact on behaviour.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.