Randomized controlled trial2015

Acute Dietary Nitrate Intake Improves Muscle Contractile Function in Patients With Heart Failure: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial

Coggan AR, Leibowitz JL, Spearie CA, Kadkhodayan A, Thomas DP, Ramamurthy S, Mahmood K, Park S, Waller S, Farmer M, Peterson LR

Circulation. Heart failure · 107 citations

Review labels

Controlled feeding

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Food provided by researchers

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Government
NCATS NIH HHS
Grants
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1-TR-000448)

Based on 2 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2015-07-16 · Circ Heart Fail · vol. 8 · issue 5 · pp. 914–920
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Cited
138 citations · more than 100% of similar papers · 37.7× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
43 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology · Exercise and Physiological Responses · Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Keywords
Medicine, Heart failure, Crossover study, Ingestion, Internal medicine, Placebo, Cardiology, Dietary Nitrate, Nitric oxide, Blood pressure, Bioavailability, Endocrinology, Nitrate, Nitrite, Pharmacology
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, humans, nitrates, exercise, pilot projects, cross-over studies, double-blind method, oxygen consumption, muscle contraction, dose-response relationship, drug, quality of life, dietary supplements, middle aged, female, male, heart failure

11 authors

  • Andrew R. Coggan
  • Joshua L. Leibowitz
  • Catherine Anderson Spearie
  • Ana Kadkhodayan
  • Deepak P. Thomas
  • Sujata Ramamurthy

Abstract

Background

Skeletal muscle strength, velocity, and power are markedly reduced in patients with heart failure, which contributes to their impaired exercise capacity and lower quality of life. This muscle dysfunction may be partially because of decreased nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability. We therefore sought to determine whether ingestion of inorganic nitrate (NO3 (-)) would increase NO production and improve muscle function in patients with heart failure because of systolic dysfunction.

Methods and results

Using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover design, we determined the effects of dietary NO3 (-) in 9 patients with heart failure. After fasting overnight, subjects drank beetroot juice containing or devoid of 11.2 mmol of NO3 (-). Two hours later, muscle function was assessed using isokinetic dynamometry. Dietary NO3 (-) increased (P<0.05-0.001) breath NO by 35% to 50%. This was accompanied by 9% (P=0.07) and 11% (P<0.05) increases in peak knee extensor power at the 2 highest movement velocities tested (ie, 4.71 and 6.28 rad/s). Maximal power (calculated by fitting peak power data with a parabola) was therefore greater (ie, 4.74±0.41 versus 4.20±0.33 W/kg; P<0.05) after dietary NO3 (-) intake. Calculated maximal velocity of knee extension was also higher after NO3 (-) ingestion (ie, 12.48±0.95 versus 11.11±0.53 rad/s; P<0.05). Blood pressure was unchanged, and no adverse clinical events occurred.

Conclusions

In this pilot study, acute dietary NO3 (-) intake was well tolerated and enhanced NO bioavailability and muscle power in patients with systolic heart failure. Larger-scale studies should be conducted to determine whether the latter translates into an improved quality of life in this population.

Clinical trial registration

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01682356.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.