Meta-analysis2015Open access

The Effects of Perioperative Music Interventions in Pediatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

van der Heijden MJ, Oliai Araghi S, van Dijk M, Jeekel J, Hunink MG

PloS one · 78 citations

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Nonprofit
Stichting Coolsingel

Based on 1 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2015-08-06 · PLoS One · vol. 10 · issue 8 · p. e0133608
Publisher
Public Library of Science
Cited
127 citations · more than 85% of similar papers · 1.9× the field average
References
57 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Music Therapy and Health · Pediatric Pain Management Techniques · Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
Randomized controlled trial, Medicine, Visual analogue scale, Perioperative, Anxiety, Meta-analysis, Music therapy, Distress, Physical therapy, Psychological intervention, MEDLINE, Systematic review, Anesthesia, Surgery, Internal medicine, Clinical psychology, Psychiatry
MeSH
humans, pain, pain measurement, music therapy, stress, psychological, anxiety, databases, factual, randomized controlled trials as topic

5 authors

From NL, US

  • Marianne J. E. van der Heijden · correspondingErasmus MC; Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Sadaf Oliai AraghiErasmus MC; Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Monique van DijkErasmus MC; Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • J JeekelErasmus MC; Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • M. G. Myriam HuninkHarvard University; Erasmus MC; Erasmus University Rotterdam

Abstract

Objective

Music interventions are widely used, but have not yet gained a place in guidelines for pediatric surgery or pediatric anesthesia. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we examined the effects of music interventions on pain, anxiety and distress in children undergoing invasive surgery.

Data sources

We searched 25 electronic databases from their first available date until October 2014.

Study selection

Included were all randomized controlled trials with a parallel group, crossover or cluster design that included pediatric patients from 1 month to 18 years old undergoing minimally invasive or invasive surgical procedures, and receiving either live music therapy or recorded music.

Data extraction and synthesis

4846 records were retrieved from the searches, 26 full text reports were evaluated and data was extracted by two independent investigators.

Main outcome measures

Pain was measured with the Visual Analogue Scale, the Coloured Analogue Scale and the Facial Pain Scale. Anxiety and distress were measured with an emotional index scale (not validated), the Spielberger short State Trait Anxiety Inventory and a Facial Affective Scale.

Results

Three RCTs were eligible for inclusion encompassing 196 orthopedic, cardiac and day surgery patients (age of 1 day to 18 years) receiving either live music therapy or recorded music. Overall a statistically significant positive effect was demonstrated on postoperative pain (SMD -1.07; 95%CI-2.08; -0.07) and on anxiety and distress (SMD -0.34 95% CI -0.66; -0.01 and SMD -0.50; 95% CI -0.84; - 0.16.

Conclusions and relevance

This systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that music interventions may have a statistically significant effect in reducing post-operative pain, anxiety and distress in children undergoing a surgical procedure. Evidence from this review and other reviews suggests music therapy may be considered for clinical use.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.