Meta-analysis2015

Egg intake and cancers of the breast, ovary and prostate: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective observational studies

Keum N, Lee DH, Marchand N, Oh H, Liu H, Aune D, Greenwood DC, Giovannucci EL

The British journal of nutrition · 31 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2015-08-21 · Br J Nutr · vol. 114 · issue 7 · pp. 1099–1107
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Cited
44 citations · more than 58% of similar papers · 0.6× the field average
References
66 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism · Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
Medicine, Meta-analysis, Relative risk, Breast cancer, Prospective cohort study, Prostate cancer, Internal medicine, Prostate, Oncology, Gynecology, Publication bias, Etiology, Cancer, Physiology, Confidence interval
MeSH
humans, breast neoplasms, ovarian neoplasms, prostatic neoplasms, choline, cholesterol, diet, risk factors, dose-response relationship, drug, eggs, databases, factual, female, male, observational studies as topic

8 authors

From US, CN, NO, GB

  • NaNa Keum · correspondingHarvard University
  • Dong Hoon LeeHarvard University
  • Nathalie E. MarchandHarvard University
  • Hannah OhHarvard University
  • Huijun LiuZhejiang A & F University; Zhejiang University
  • Dagfinn AuneNorwegian University of Science and Technology; Imperial College London

Abstract

Evidence suggests that egg intake may be implicated in the aetiology of sex hormone-related cancers. However, dose-response relationships between egg intake and such cancers are unclear. Thus, we conducted a dose-response meta-analysis to summarise the dose-response relationships between egg consumption and the risk of breast, prostate and gynaecological cancers. A literature search was performed using PubMed and Embase up to April 2015 to identify relevant prospective observational studies. Summary relative risk (RR) and 95% CI were estimated using a random-effects model. For breast cancer, the linear dose-response meta-analysis found a non-significantly increased risk (RR for an increase of 5 eggs consumed/week: 1·05, 95% CI 0·99, 1·11, n 16,023 cases). Evidence for non-linearity was not statistically significant (P non-linearity= 0·50, n 15,415 cases) but consuming ≥ 5 eggs/week was significantly associated with an increased risk of breast cancer compared with no egg consumption, with the summary RR being 1·04 (95% CI 1·01, 1·07) for consuming 5 eggs/week and 1·09 (95% CI 1·03, 1·15) for consuming about 9 eggs/week. For other cancers investigated, the summary RR for an increase of 5 eggs consumed/week was 1·09 (95% CI 0·96, 1·24, n 2636 cases) for ovarian cancer; 1·47 (95% CI 1·01, 2·14, n 609 cases) for fatal prostate cancer, with evidence of small-study effects (P Egger= 0·04). No evidence was found for an association with the risk of total prostate cancer. While our conclusion was tempered by the potential for publication bias and confounding, high egg intake may be associated with a modestly elevated risk of breast cancer, and a positive association between egg intake and ovarian and fatal prostate cancers cannot be ruled out.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.