Egg intake and cancers of the breast, ovary and prostate: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective observational studies
Keum N, Lee DH, Marchand N, Oh H, Liu H, Aune D, Greenwood DC, Giovannucci EL
The British journal of nutrition · 31 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Clinical events such as disease or death
- Intake measured by
- Not stated
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2015-08-21 · Br J Nutr · vol. 114 · issue 7 · pp. 1099–1107
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Cited
- 44 citations · more than 58% of similar papers · 0.6× the field average
- References
- 66 works
- Access
- Free to read
- Research areas
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism · Cancer Risks and Factors
- Keywords
- Medicine, Meta-analysis, Relative risk, Breast cancer, Prospective cohort study, Prostate cancer, Internal medicine, Prostate, Oncology, Gynecology, Publication bias, Etiology, Cancer, Physiology, Confidence interval
- MeSH
- humans, breast neoplasms, ovarian neoplasms, prostatic neoplasms, choline, cholesterol, diet, risk factors, dose-response relationship, drug, eggs, databases, factual, female, male, observational studies as topic
8 authors
From US, CN, NO, GB
- NaNa Keum · correspondingHarvard University
- Dong Hoon LeeHarvard University
- Nathalie E. MarchandHarvard University
- Hannah OhHarvard University
- Huijun LiuZhejiang A & F University; Zhejiang University
- Dagfinn AuneNorwegian University of Science and Technology; Imperial College London
Abstract
Evidence suggests that egg intake may be implicated in the aetiology of sex hormone-related cancers. However, dose-response relationships between egg intake and such cancers are unclear. Thus, we conducted a dose-response meta-analysis to summarise the dose-response relationships between egg consumption and the risk of breast, prostate and gynaecological cancers. A literature search was performed using PubMed and Embase up to April 2015 to identify relevant prospective observational studies. Summary relative risk (RR) and 95% CI were estimated using a random-effects model. For breast cancer, the linear dose-response meta-analysis found a non-significantly increased risk (RR for an increase of 5 eggs consumed/week: 1·05, 95% CI 0·99, 1·11, n 16,023 cases). Evidence for non-linearity was not statistically significant (P non-linearity= 0·50, n 15,415 cases) but consuming ≥ 5 eggs/week was significantly associated with an increased risk of breast cancer compared with no egg consumption, with the summary RR being 1·04 (95% CI 1·01, 1·07) for consuming 5 eggs/week and 1·09 (95% CI 1·03, 1·15) for consuming about 9 eggs/week. For other cancers investigated, the summary RR for an increase of 5 eggs consumed/week was 1·09 (95% CI 0·96, 1·24, n 2636 cases) for ovarian cancer; 1·47 (95% CI 1·01, 2·14, n 609 cases) for fatal prostate cancer, with evidence of small-study effects (P Egger= 0·04). No evidence was found for an association with the risk of total prostate cancer. While our conclusion was tempered by the potential for publication bias and confounding, high egg intake may be associated with a modestly elevated risk of breast cancer, and a positive association between egg intake and ovarian and fatal prostate cancers cannot be ruled out.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.