Randomized controlled trial2015

Caffeine and Progression of Parkinson Disease: A Deleterious Interaction With Creatine

Simon DK, Wu C, Tilley BC, Wills AM, Aminoff MJ, Bainbridge J, Hauser RA, Schneider JS, Sharma S, Singer C, Tanner CM, Truong D, Wong PS

Clinical neuropharmacology · 21 citations

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Government
National Center for Research Resources
Government
NCRR NIH HHS
Government
NINDS NIH HHS
Grants
National Center for Research Resources (UL1 RR 025758); National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U10 NS044482)

Based on 4 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2015-09-01 · Clin Neuropharmacol · vol. 38 · issue 5 · pp. 163–169
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Cited
28 citations · more than 92% of similar papers · 3.6× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
21 works
Access
Open access (repository copy)
Research areas
Coffee research and impacts · Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments · Folate and B Vitamins Research
Keywords
Caffeine, Medicine, Parkinson's disease, Disease, Neuroscience, Psychology, Internal medicine
MeSH
humans, parkinson disease, disease progression, creatine, caffeine, central nervous system stimulants, drug interactions, middle aged, female, male

13 authors

From US, SG

  • David K. Simon · correspondingBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Harvard University; University of Rochester Medicine; University of Colorado Anschutz
  • Cai WuUniversity of Miami; The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
  • Barbara C. TilleyUniversity of Miami; The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
  • Anne-Marie A. WillsSan Francisco VA Medical Center; Harvard University; Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Michael J. AminoffUniversity of California, San Francisco; Parkinson's and Movement Disorder Institute
  • Jacquelyn L. BainbridgeSingapore General Hospital; University of Colorado Anschutz; University of Montana

Abstract

Objective

Increased caffeine intake is associated with a lower risk of Parkinson disease (PD) and is neuroprotective in mouse models of PD. However, in a previous study, an exploratory analysis suggested that, in patients taking creatine, caffeine intake was associated with a faster rate of progression. In the current study, we investigated the association of caffeine with the rate of progression of PD and the interaction of this association with creatine intake.

Methods

Data were analyzed from a large phase 3 placebo-controlled clinical study of creatine as a potentially disease-modifying agent in PD. Subjects were recruited for this study from 45 movement disorders centers across the United States and Canada. A total of 1741 subjects with PD participated in the primary clinical study, and caffeine intake data were available for 1549 of these subjects. The association of caffeine intake with rate of progression of PD as measured by the change in the total Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale score and the interaction of this association with creatine intake were assessed.

Results

Caffeine intake was not associated with the rate of progression of PD in the main analysis, but higher caffeine intake was associated with significantly faster progression among subjects taking creatine.

Conclusions

This is the largest and longest study conducted to date that addresses the association of caffeine with the rate of progression of PD. These data indicate a potentially deleterious interaction between caffeine and creatine with respect to the rate of progression of PD.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.