Meta-analysis2016

Linoleic acid and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Zhou Y, Wang T, Zhai S, Li W, Meng Q

Public health nutrition · 41 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2015-10-05 · Public Health Nutr · vol. 19 · issue 8 · pp. 1457–1463
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Cited
66 citations · more than 43% of similar papers · 0.2× the field average
References
35 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Fatty Acid Research and Health · Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism · Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Keywords
Linoleic acid, Breast cancer, Medicine, Prospective cohort study, Internal medicine, Relative risk, Meta-analysis, Cohort study, Lower risk, Cancer, Conjugated linoleic acid, Fatty acid, Endocrinology, Gastroenterology, Chemistry, Confidence interval, Biochemistry
MeSH
humans, breast neoplasms, linoleic acid, diet, risk factors, female

5 authors

From CN

  • Yunping ZhouThe Fourth People's Hospital of Zibo City; Shandong Center for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Tao WangThe Fourth People's Hospital of Zibo City; Shandong Center for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Shenyong ZhaiThe Fourth People's Hospital of Zibo City; Shandong Center for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Wei LiThe Fourth People's Hospital of Zibo City; Shandong Center for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Qiang Meng · correspondingThe Fourth People's Hospital of Zibo City; Shandong Center for Disease Control and Prevention

Abstract

Objective

Prior studies on linoleic acid, the predominant n-6 fatty acid, and breast cancer risk have generated inconsistent results. We performed a meta-analysis to summarize the evidence regarding the relationship of dietary and serum linoleic acid with breast cancer risk.

Design

Pertinent studies were identified by a search of PubMed and EMBASE. The fixed- or random-effect pooled measure was selected based on between-study heterogeneity.

Results

Eight prospective cohort studies and four prospective nested case-control studies, involving 10 410 breast cancer events from 358 955 adult females across different countries, were included in present study. Compared with the lowest level of linoleic acid, the pooled relative risk (RR; 95 % CI) of breast cancer was 0·98 (0·93, 1·04) for the highest level of linoleic acid. The pooled RR (95 % CI) for dietary and serum linoleic acid were 0·99 (0·92, 1·06) and 0·98 (0·88, 1·08), respectively. The RR (95 % CI) of breast cancer was 0·97 (0·91, 1·04), 0·95 (0·85, 1·07), 0·96 (0·86, 1·07), 0·98 (0·87, 1·10) and 0·99 (0·85, 1·14) for linoleic acid intake of 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 g/d, respectively. The risk of breast cancer decreased by 1 % (RR=0·99; 95 % CI 0·93, 1·05) for every 10 g/d increment in linoleic acid intake.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis indicated that both dietary linoleic acid intake and serum linoleic acid level were associated with decreased risk of breast cancer, although none of the associations were statistically significant. Further investigations are warranted.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.