Association of Processed Meat Intake with Hypertension Risk in Hemodialysis Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Wu PY, Yang SH, Wong TC, Chen TW, Chen HH, Chen TH, Chen YT
PloS one · 14 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Case-control study (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Health markers and function
- Intake measured by
- Food diaries or recalls
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Independent funding
- Government
- National Science Council
Based on 1 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.
Publication
- Published
- 2015-10-30 · PLoS One · vol. 10 · issue 10 · p. e0141917
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science
- Cited
- 21 citations · more than 88% of similar papers · 2.3× the field average
- References
- 78 works
- Access
- Open access (journal) · CC-BY
- Research areas
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Sodium Intake and Health · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Keywords
- Blood pressure, Medicine, Odds ratio, Confidence interval, Hemodialysis, Cross-sectional study, Internal medicine, Diastole, Red meat, Body mass index, Dialysis, Cardiology, Pathology
- MeSH
- humans, hypertension, sodium, dietary, renal dialysis, case-control studies, blood pressure, aged, middle aged, female, male, renal insufficiency, chronic, red meat
7 authors
From TW
- Peï-Yu WuTaipei Medical University
- Shwu‐Huey Yang · correspondingTaipei Medical University
- Te-Chih WongTaipei Medical University
- Tzen-Wen ChenTaipei Medical University Hospital; Wan Fang Hospital
- His-Hsien ChenTaipei Medical University Hospital
- Tso-Hsiao ChenTaipei Medical University Hospital; Wan Fang Hospital
Abstract
In this cross-sectional study, we hypothesized that hemodialysis patients consuming greater processed meat is associated with hypertension risk, which can be partly explained by the high sodium content in processed meat. From September 2013 to May 2014, one hundred and four patients requiring chronic hemodialysis treatment were recruited from hemodialysis centers. Data on systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure before receiving dialysis, and 3-day dietary records of the recruited patients were collected. HD patients with systolic and diastolic blood pressures greater than140 mmHg and higher than 90 mmHg, respectively, were considered hypertension risk. Protein foods were divided into 4 categories: red meat, white meat, soybeans, and processed meat (e.g., sausage and ham). In a model adjusted for energy intake and hypertension history, additional servings of processed meats was positively associated to systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 2.1 [1.0-4.3]), and diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg (odds ratio: 2.5 [1.2-5.5]). After adjustment for dietary sodium contents or body mass index (BMI), most associations were substantially attenuated and were no longer significant. In systolic blood pressure greater than140 mmHg, one serving per day of red meats (β = -1.22, P < .05) and white meats (β = -0. 75, P = .05) was associated with a reduced risk compared with one serving per day of processed meats. Similarly, compared with one serving per day of processed meat, a reduced risk of diastolic blood pressure higher than 90 mmHg was associated with one serving per day of red meat (β = -1. 59, P < .05), white meat (β = -0. 62, P < .05). Thus, in these hemodialysis patients, intake of processed meat is significantly positively associated with higher blood pressure risk, and both sodium contents in processed meat and BMI significantly contributes to this association.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.