Randomized controlled trial2016Industry fundedOpen access

Funded in part by Bio-Tech Pharmacal

Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations ≥40 ng/ml Are Associated with >65% Lower Cancer Risk: Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trial and Prospective Cohort Study

McDonnell SL, Baggerly C, French CB, Baggerly LL, Garland CF, Gorham ED, Lappe JM, Heaney RP

PloS one · 86 citations

Review labels

Industry funded

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death

Who paid for it

Funding
Industry funded
Government
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Company
Bio-Tech Pharmacal
Government
National Institute on Aging
Government
NIA NIH HHS
Grants
National Institute on Aging (R01 AG014683); National Institute on Aging (AG14683-01A2)

Based on 4 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2016-04-06 · PLoS One · vol. 11 · issue 4 · p. e0152441
Publisher
Public Library of Science
Cited
111 citations · more than 99% of similar papers · 13.4× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
34 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Vitamin D Research Studies · Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment · Biotin and Related Studies
Keywords
Medicine, Cohort, Prospective cohort study, Internal medicine, Cancer, Incidence (geometry), Cohort study, Proportional hazards model, Gastroenterology
MeSH
humans, neoplasms, vitamin d, incidence, risk factors, prospective studies, aged, middle aged, female

8 authors

From US

  • Sharon L. McDonnell · correspondingGrassrootsHealth
  • Carole A. BaggerlyGrassrootsHealth
  • Christine FrenchGrassrootsHealth
  • Leo L. BaggerlyGrassrootsHealth
  • Cedric F. GarlandUniversity of California San Diego
  • Edward Doerr GorhamUniversity of California San Diego

Abstract

Background

Higher serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations have been associated with a lower risk of multiple cancer types across a range of 25(OH)D concentrations.

Objectives

To investigate whether the previously reported inverse association between 25(OH)D and cancer risk could be replicated, and if a 25(OH)D response region could be identified among women aged 55 years and older across a broad range of 25(OH)D concentrations.

Methods

Data from two cohorts representing different median 25(OH)D concentrations were pooled to afford a broader range of 25(OH)D concentrations than either cohort alone: the Lappe cohort (N = 1,169), a randomized clinical trial cohort (median 25(OH)D = 30 ng/ml) and the GrassrootsHealth cohort (N = 1,135), a prospective cohort (median 25(OH)D = 48 ng/ml). Cancer incidence over a multi-year period (median: 3.9 years) was compared according to 25(OH)D concentration. Kaplan-Meier plots were developed and the association between 25(OH)D and cancer risk was examined with multivariate Cox regression using multiple 25(OH)D measurements and spline functions. The study included all invasive cancers excluding skin cancer.

Results

Age-adjusted cancer incidence across the combined cohort (N = 2,304) was 840 cases per 100,000 person-years (1,020 per 100,000 person-years in the Lappe cohort and 722 per 100,000 person-years in the GrassrootsHealth cohort). Incidence was lower at higher concentrations of 25(OH)D. Women with 25(OH)D concentrations ≥40 ng/ml had a 67% lower risk of cancer than women with concentrations <20 ng/ml (HR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.12-0.90).

Conclusions

25(OH)D concentrations ≥40 ng/ml were associated with substantial reduction in risk of all invasive cancers combined.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.