The comparison of cold-water immersion and cold air therapy on maximal cycling performance and recovery markers following strength exercises
Hayter KJ, Doma K, Schumann M, Deakin GB
PeerJ · 13 citations
How it was studied
- Design
- Randomized controlled trial (classified by our AI screen)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Health markers and function
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Independent funding
Based on full-text disclosure statement.
Publication
- Published
- 2016-03-28 · PeerJ · vol. 4 · p. e1841
- Publisher
- PeerJ, Inc.
- Cited
- 19 citations · more than 88% of similar papers · 2.6× the field average
- References
- 53 works
- Access
- Open access (journal) · CC-BY
- Research areas
- Exercise and Physiological Responses · Sports Performance and Training · Sports injuries and prevention
- Keywords
- Cycling, Anaerobic exercise, Medicine, Isometric exercise, Creatine kinase, Leg press, Materials science, Physical therapy, Animal science, Muscle strength, Internal medicine, Biology
4 authors
From AU, FI
- Kane HayterJames Cook University
- Kenji DomaJames Cook University
- Moritz SchumannUniversity of Jyväskylä
- Glen Bede DeakinJames Cook University
Abstract
This study examined the effects of cold-water immersion (CWI) and cold air therapy (CAT) on maximal cycling performance (i.e. anaerobic power) and markers of muscle damage following a strength training session. Twenty endurance-trained but strength-untrained male (n = 10) and female (n = 10) participants were randomised into either: CWI (15 min in 14 °C water to iliac crest) or CAT (15 min in 14 °C air) immediately following strength training (i.e. 3 sets of leg press, leg extensions and leg curls at 6 repetition maximum, respectively). Creatine kinase, muscle soreness and fatigue, isometric knee extensor and flexor torque and cycling anaerobic power were measured prior to, immediately after and at 24 (T24), 48 (T48) and 72 (T72) h post-strength exercises. No significant differences were found between treatments for any of the measured variables (p > 0.05). However, trends suggested recovery was greater in CWI than CAT for cycling anaerobic power at T24 (10% ± 2%, ES = 0.90), T48 (8% ± 2%, ES = 0.64) and T72 (8% ± 7%, ES = 0.76). The findings suggest the combination of hydrostatic pressure and cold temperature may be favourable for recovery from strength training rather than cold temperature alone.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.