Study2016Open access

The comparison of cold-water immersion and cold air therapy on maximal cycling performance and recovery markers following strength exercises

Hayter KJ, Doma K, Schumann M, Deakin GB

PeerJ · 13 citations

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding

Based on full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2016-03-28 · PeerJ · vol. 4 · p. e1841
Publisher
PeerJ, Inc.
Cited
19 citations · more than 88% of similar papers · 2.6× the field average
References
53 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Exercise and Physiological Responses · Sports Performance and Training · Sports injuries and prevention
Keywords
Cycling, Anaerobic exercise, Medicine, Isometric exercise, Creatine kinase, Leg press, Materials science, Physical therapy, Animal science, Muscle strength, Internal medicine, Biology

4 authors

From AU, FI

  • Kane HayterJames Cook University
  • Kenji DomaJames Cook University
  • Moritz SchumannUniversity of Jyväskylä
  • Glen Bede DeakinJames Cook University

Abstract

This study examined the effects of cold-water immersion (CWI) and cold air therapy (CAT) on maximal cycling performance (i.e. anaerobic power) and markers of muscle damage following a strength training session. Twenty endurance-trained but strength-untrained male (n = 10) and female (n = 10) participants were randomised into either: CWI (15 min in 14 °C water to iliac crest) or CAT (15 min in 14 °C air) immediately following strength training (i.e. 3 sets of leg press, leg extensions and leg curls at 6 repetition maximum, respectively). Creatine kinase, muscle soreness and fatigue, isometric knee extensor and flexor torque and cycling anaerobic power were measured prior to, immediately after and at 24 (T24), 48 (T48) and 72 (T72) h post-strength exercises. No significant differences were found between treatments for any of the measured variables (p > 0.05). However, trends suggested recovery was greater in CWI than CAT for cycling anaerobic power at T24 (10% ± 2%, ES = 0.90), T48 (8% ± 2%, ES = 0.64) and T72 (8% ± 7%, ES = 0.76). The findings suggest the combination of hydrostatic pressure and cold temperature may be favourable for recovery from strength training rather than cold temperature alone.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.