Randomized controlled trial2016

Effects of High-Dose Vitamin D2 Versus D3 on Total and Free 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Markers of Calcium Balance

Shieh A, Chun RF, Ma C, Witzel S, Meyer B, Rafison B, Swinkels L, Huijs T, Pepkowitz S, Holmquist B, Hewison M, Adams JS

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 70 citations

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
Government
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Government
NIAMS NIH HHS
Government
NCATS NIH HHS
Grants
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL-1TR000124); National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (P50AR063020); National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR063910)

Based on 4 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2016-05-18 · J Clin Endocrinol Metab · vol. 101 · issue 8 · pp. 3070–3078
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Cited
98 citations · more than 98% of similar papers · 8.7× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
53 works
Access
Open access (repository copy)
Research areas
Vitamin D Research Studies · Bone health and osteoporosis research · Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
Internal medicine, Vitamin D and neurology, Endocrinology, Medicine, Vitamin, Creatinine, Ergocalciferol, Calcium, Vitamin D-binding protein, Cholecalciferol, vitamin D deficiency
MeSH
humans, vitamin d deficiency, calcium, cholecalciferol, ergocalciferols, parathyroid hormone, vitamin d, hormone replacement therapy, case-control studies, homeostasis, dose-response relationship, drug, adult, aged, middle aged, biomarkers

12 authors

From US, NL, GB

  • Albert Shieh · correspondingUniversity of California, Los Angeles
  • Rene F. ChunUniversity of California, Los Angeles
  • Christina MaUniversity of California, Los Angeles
  • Sten de Boom WitzelUniversity of California, Los Angeles
  • Briana P. MeyerUniversity of California, Los Angeles
  • Brandon RafisonUniversity of California, Los Angeles

Abstract

Context

Controversy persists over: 1) how best to restore low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25D) levels (vitamin D2 [D2] vs vitamin D3 [D3]); 2) how best to define vitamin D status (total [protein-bound + free] vs free 25D); and 3) how best to assess the bioactivity of free 25D.

Objective

To assess: 1) the effects of D2 vs D3 on serum total and free 25D; and 2) whether change in intact PTH (iPTH) is more strongly associated with change in total vs free 25D.

Design

Participants previously enrolled in a D2 vs D3 trial were matched for age, body mass index, and race/ethnicity. Participants received 50 000 IU of D2 or D3 twice weekly for 5 weeks, followed by a 5-week equilibration period. Biochemical assessment was performed at baseline and at 10 weeks.

Setting and participants

Thirty-eight adults (19 D2 and 19 D3) ≥18 years of age with baseline 25D levels <30 ng/mL were recruited from an academic ambulatory osteoporosis clinic.

Outcome measures

Serum measures were total 25D, free 25D (directly measured), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, calcium, and iPTH. Urine measure was fasting calcium:creatinine ratio.

Results

Baseline total (22.2 ± 3.3 vs 23.3 ± 7.2 ng/mL; P = .5) and free (5.4 ± 0.8 vs 5.3 ± 1.7 pg/mL; P = .8) 25D levels were similar between D2 and D3 groups. Increases in total (+27.6 vs +12.2 ng/mL; P = .001) and free (+3.6 vs +6.2 pg/mL; P = .02) 25D levels were greater with D3 vs D2. Percentage change in iPTH was significantly associated with change in free (but not total) 25D, without and with adjustment for supplementation regimen, change in 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, and change in calcium.

Conclusions

D3 increased total and free 25D levels to a greater extent than D2. Free 25D may be superior to total 25D as a marker of vitamin D bioactivity.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.