Systematic review2016Industry funded

Funded in part by General Mills

Consumption of whole grains and cereal fiber in relation to cancer risk: a systematic review of longitudinal studies

Makarem N, Nicholson JM, Bandera EV, McKeown NM, Parekh N

Nutrition reviews · 34 citations

Review labels

Industry funded

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Systematic review (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Industry funded
Nonprofit
American Cancer Society
Company
General Mills
Grants
American Cancer Society (RSG-12-005-01-CNE)

Based on 2 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2016-05-05 · Nutr Rev · vol. 74 · issue 6 · pp. 353–373
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Cited
51 citations · more than 77% of similar papers · 1.3× the field average
References
74 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Food composition and properties · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Phytoestrogen effects and research
Keywords
Medicine, Confounding, Whole grains, Context (archaeology), Relative risk, Longitudinal study, Meta-analysis, Environmental health, Cohort study, Demography, Internal medicine, Food science, Biology, Confidence interval, Pathology
MeSH
humans, neoplasms, diet, risk, longitudinal studies, dietary fiber, north america, europe, edible grain

5 authors

From US

  • Nour MakaremRutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Tufts University; New York University
  • Joey NicholsonRutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Tufts University; New York University
  • Elisa Victoria BanderaRutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Tufts University; New York University
  • Nicola Mary McKeownRutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Tufts University; New York University
  • Niyati ParekhRutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Tufts University; New York University

Abstract

Context

Evidence from previous reviews is supportive of the hypothesis that whole grains may protect against various cancers. However, the reviews did not report risk estimates for both whole grains and cereal fiber and only case-control studies were evaluated. It is unclear whether longitudinal studies support this conclusion.

Objective

To evaluate associations between whole grains and cereal fiber in relation to risk of lifestyle-related cancers data from longitudinal studies was evaluated.

Data sources

The following 3 databases were systematically searched: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL.

Study selection

A total of 43 longitudinal studies conducted in Europe and North America that reported multivariable-adjusted risk estimates for whole grains (n = 14), cereal fiber (n = 23), or both (n = 6) in relation to lifestyle-related cancers were included.

Data extraction

Information on study location, cohort name, follow-up duration, sample characteristics, dietary assessment method, risk estimates, and confounders was extracted.

Data synthesis

Of 20 studies examining whole grains and cancer, 6 studies reported a statistically significant 6%-47% reduction in risk, but 14 studies showed no association. Of 29 studies examining cereal fiber intake in relation to cancer, 8 showed a statistically significant 6%-49% reduction in risk, whereas 21 studies reported no association.

Conclusions

This systematic review concludes that most studies were suggestive of a null association. Whole grains and cereal fiber may protect against gastrointestinal cancers, but these findings require confirmation in additional studies.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.