Study2017Open access

The quantity and quality of α-gal-specific antibodies differ in individuals with and without delayed red meat allergy

Kollmann D, Nagl B, Ebner C, Emminger W, Wöhrl S, Kitzmüller C, Vrtala S, Mangold A, Ankersmit HJ, Bohle B

Allergy · 42 citations

Review labels

Lumps processed with unprocessed meatNo stated lifestyle adjustment

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Case-control study (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
Austrian Science Fund
Nonprofit
Christian Doppler Forschungsgesellschaft
Government
Austrian Science Fund FWF
Grants
Austrian Science Fund (SFB‐F4610); Austrian Science Fund (project SFB F4610)

Based on 3 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2016-06-04 · Allergy · vol. 72 · issue 2 · pp. 266–273
Publisher
Wiley
Cited
50 citations · more than 92% of similar papers · 3.5× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
36 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research · Xenotransplantation and immune response · Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Keywords
Red meat, Allergy, Medicine, Antibody, Immunology, Quality (philosophy), Food science, Biology
MeSH
humans, hypersensitivity, delayed, food hypersensitivity, galactose, immunoglobulin e, immunoglobulin g, antibodies, allergens, antibody specificity, adult, aged, aged, 80 and over, middle aged, female, male, red meat

10 authors

From AT

  • Dagmar KollmannMedical University of Vienna
  • Birgit NaglMedical University of Vienna
  • Christof Ebner
  • Waltraud Emminger
  • Stefan WöhrlAllergiezentrum Wien West
  • Claudia KitzmüllerMedical University of Vienna

Abstract

Background

IgG to galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-gal) are highly abundant natural antibodies (Ab) in humans. α-Gal-specific IgE Ab cause a special form of meat allergy characterized by severe systemic reactions 3-7 h after consumption of red meat. We investigated 20 patients who experienced such reactions and characterized their α-gal-specific IgE and IgG responses in more detail.

Methods

α-Gal-specific IgE was determined by ImmunoCAP. IgE reactivity to meat extract and bovine gamma globulin (BGG) was assessed by immunoblotting and ELISA, respectively. In some experiments, sera were pre-incubated with α-gal or protein G to deplete IgG Ab. α-Gal-specific IgG1-4 Ab in individuals with and without meat allergy were assessed by ELISA.

Results

In immunoblots, BGG was the most frequently recognized meat protein. Binding of IgE and IgG to BGG was confirmed by ELISA and completely abolished after pre-incubation with α-gal. Neither the depletion of autologous α-gal-specific IgG Ab nor the addition of α-gal-specific IgG Ab from nonallergic individuals changed the IgE recognition of BGG of meat-allergic patients. Meat-allergic patients showed significantly higher α-gal-specific IgG1 and IgG3 Ab than nonallergic individuals, whereas the latter showed significantly higher levels of α-gal-specific IgG4 Ab.

Conclusion

Patients with delayed meat allergy display IgE and IgG Ab that selectively recognize the α-gal epitope on BGG. Their enhanced α-gal-specific IgE levels are accompanied by high levels of α-gal-specific IgG1 devoid of IgE-blocking activity. This subclass distribution is atypical for food allergies and distinct from natural α-gal IgG responses in nonallergic individuals.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.