Cross-sectional study2016

Relation of unprocessed, processed red meat and poultry consumption to blood pressure in East Asian and Western adults

Oude Griep LM, Seferidi P, Stamler J, Van Horn L, Chan Q, Tzoulaki I, Steffen LM, Miura K, Ueshima H, Okuda N, Zhao L, Soedamah-Muthu SS, Daviglus ML, Elliott P, INTERMAP Research Group

Journal of hypertension · 27 citations

Review labels

No stated lifestyle adjustment

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Cross-sectional study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Food diaries or recalls

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Government
Medical Research Council
Government
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Government
NHLBI NIH HHS
Government
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
Grants
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL084228); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL050490); Medical Research Council (MR/L01341X/1); National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0611-10136)

Based on 5 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2016-07-04 · J Hypertens · vol. 34 · issue 9 · pp. 1721–1729
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Cited
32 citations · more than 91% of similar papers · 2.7× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
22 works
Access
Open access (repository copy)
Research areas
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Meat and Animal Product Quality · Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
Medicine, Red meat, Micronutrient, Blood pressure, Population, Food science, Animal science, Environmental health, Internal medicine, Biology
MeSH
animals, poultry, humans, diet, cross-sectional studies, blood pressure, adult, middle aged, china, japan, female, male, red meat, united kingdom

14 authors

From CN, US, GB, JP, NL

  • Linda M. Oude Griep · correspondingChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College; University of Illinois Chicago; Faculty of Public Health; Imperial College London
  • Paraskevi SeferidiImperial College London
  • Jeremiah StamlerNorthwestern University
  • Linda Van HornNorthwestern University
  • Queenie M ChanFaculty of Public Health
  • Ioanna TzoulakiFaculty of Public Health

Abstract

Background

Epidemiologic evidence suggests that relationships of red meat consumption with risk of cardiovascular diseases depends on whether or not the meat is processed, including addition of preservatives, but evidence is limited for blood pressure (BP).

Objective

To examine cross-sectional associations with BP of unprocessed and processed red meat and poultry consumption, total and by type, using data from the INTERnational study on MAcro/micronutrients and blood Pressure.

Design

INTERnational study on MAcro/micronutrients and blood Pressure included 4680 men and women ages 40-59 years from 17 population samples in Japan, China, the United Kingdom, and the United States. During four visits, eight BP measurements, four multipass 24-h dietary recalls, and two timed 24-h urine samples were collected.

Results

Average daily total unprocessed/processed meat consumption (g/1000 kcal) was 20/5 in East Asian and 38/21 in Western participants. Unprocessed meat intakes comprised red meat for 75% in East Asian and 50% in Western participants. In Westerners, multiple linear regression analyses showed SBP/DBP differences for total unprocessed red meat consumption higher by 25 g/1000 kcal +0.74/+0.57 mmHg (P = 0.03/0.01) and for unprocessed poultry of +0.79/+0.16 mmHg (P = 0.02/0.50). Unprocessed red meat was not related to BP in East Asian participants. In Westerners, SBP/DBP differences for processed red meat higher by 12.5 g/1000 kcal were +1.20/+0.24 mmHg (P < 0.01/0.24), due to consumption of cold cuts and sausages (+1.59/+0.32 mmHg, P < 0.001/0.27).

Conclusion

These findings are consistent with recommendations to limit meat intake (processed and unprocessed) to maintain and improve cardiovascular health.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.