Cohort study2017

Red Meat Intake and Risk of ESRD

Lew QJ, Jafar TH, Koh HW, Jin A, Chow KY, Yuan JM, Koh WP

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 176 citations

Review labels

Food frequency questionnaireLumps processed with unprocessed meatNo stated lifestyle adjustment

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Cohort study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Food frequency questionnaire

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
University or hospital
National University of Singapore
Government
National Cancer Institute
Government
NCI NIH HHS
Grants
National Cancer Institute (R01 CA080205); National Cancer Institute (R01CA144034); National Cancer Institute (UM1 CA182876)

Based on 3 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2016-07-14 · J Am Soc Nephrol · vol. 28 · issue 1 · pp. 304–312
Publisher
American Society of Nephrology
Cited
221 citations · more than 99% of similar papers · 15.1× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
33 works
Access
Open access (repository copy)
Research areas
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Renal function and acid-base balance · Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
Medicine, Quartile, Red meat, Hazard ratio, Confidence interval, Population, Relative risk, Cohort study, Lower risk, Prospective cohort study, Internal medicine, Environmental health
MeSH
humans, kidney failure, chronic, risk factors, prospective studies, aged, middle aged, female, male, red meat

7 authors

From SG, US

  • Quan-Lan Jasmine Lew · correspondingSingHealth Polyclinics
  • Tazeen H. JafarSingapore General Hospital; Duke-NUS Medical School
  • Hiromi Wai Ling KohNational University of Singapore
  • Aizhen JinHealth Promotion Board
  • Khuan Yew ChowHealth Promotion Board
  • Jian‐Min Yuan · correspondingUniversity of Pittsburgh; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials suggest that protein restriction may retard the progression of CKD toward ESRD. However, the effects of dietary protein intake level and the food sources of dietary protein on the risk of ESRD in the general population remain unclear. We investigated these effects in the Singapore Chinese Health Study, a prospective population-based cohort that recruited 63,257 Chinese adults aged 45-74 years from 1993 to 1998. We collected habitual diet information via a validated semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire and identified ESRD via record linkage with a nationwide registry. In all, 951 cases of ESRD occurred over a mean follow-up of 15.5 years. Regarding total protein intake, compared with the lowest quartile, the three higher quartiles combined had a hazard ratio for ESRD of 1.24 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.05 to 1.46), but the dose-dependent association across the quartiles was not statistically significant (Ptrend=0.16). Red meat intake strongly associated with ESRD risk in a dose-dependent manner (hazard ratio for highest quartile versus lowest quartile,1.40 [95% CI, 1.15 to 1.71; Ptrend<0.001]). Intake of poultry, fish, eggs, or dairy products did not associate with risk of ESRD. In substitution analysis, replacing one serving of red meat with other food sources of protein associated with a maximum relative risk reduction of 62.4% (95% CI, 33.1 to 78.9; P<0.01). Our study shows that red meat intake may increase the risk of ESRD in the general population and substituting alternative sources of protein may reduce the incidence of ESRD.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.