Randomized controlled trial2017

Dosages of cold-water immersion post exercise on functional and clinical responses: a randomized controlled trial

Machado AF, Almeida AC, Micheletti JK, Vanderlei FM, Tribst MF, Netto Junior J, Pastre CM

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 48 citations

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Government
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Government
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Grants
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2013/12474‐7); Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (2012/482749)

Based on 3 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2016-07-19 · Scand J Med Sci Sports · vol. 27 · issue 11 · pp. 1356–1363
Publisher
Wiley
Cited
65 citations · more than 94% of similar papers · 4.1× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
37 works
Access
Paywalled
Research areas
Exercise and Physiological Responses · Sports injuries and prevention · Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Keywords
Isometric exercise, Muscle damage, Medicine, Creatine kinase, Randomized controlled trial, Delayed onset muscle soreness, Eccentric, Dose, Physical therapy, Anesthesia, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Internal medicine
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, humans, water, creatine kinase, exercise, immersion, pain threshold, recovery of function, isometric contraction, male, cold temperature, young adult, myalgia

7 authors

From BR

  • Aryane Flauzino Machado · correspondingUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
  • Aline Castilho de AlmeidaUniversidade Federal de São Carlos
  • Jéssica Kirsch MichelettiUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
  • Franciele Marques VanderleiUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
  • M. F. TribstUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
  • Jayme NettoUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)

Abstract

Cold-water immersion (CWI) is one of the recovery techniques commonly used by athletes for post-exercise recovery. Nevertheless, the effects of CWI using different temperatures and the dose-response relationship of this technique have not yet been investigated. The aims of this study were to compare the effects of two strategies of CWI, using different water temperatures with passive recovery post exercise in the management of some markers of muscle damage, and to observe whether any of the techniques used caused deleterious effects on performance. Sixty healthy male participants performed an eccentric protocol to induce muscle damage and were then randomized to one of three groups (CWI1: 15 min at 9 °C; CWI2: 15 min at 14 °C; CG: control group). Levels of creatine kinase, muscle soreness, pain threshold, perception of recovery, and maximal voluntary isometric contraction were monitored up to 96 h post exercise. A large effect for time for all outcomes was observed [P < 0.001; CK (ES = 0.516), muscle soreness (ES = 0.368); pain threshold (ES = 0.184); perception of recovery (ES = 0.565); MVIC (ES = 0.273)]. CWI groups presented an earlier recovery for muscle soreness with lower ratings immediately post recovery. For delayed effects, the application of CWI2 (15 min at 14 °C) presented earlier recovery compared with CWI1 and control condition for maximal voluntary isometric contraction (P < 0.05). There were no significant group and interaction (Group × Time) effects. CWI groups acted more efficiently for muscle soreness and performance considering the time of recovery was observed. No evidence was found to suggest dose-response relationship and deleterious effects.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.