Randomized controlled trial2016

Guanidinoacetic acid versus creatine for improved brain and muscle creatine levels: a superiority pilot trial in healthy men

Ostojic SM, Ostojic J, Drid P, Vranes M

Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme · 31 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosedMechanisms only

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Mechanisms only

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2016-06-13 · Appl Physiol Nutr Metab · vol. 41 · issue 9 · pp. 1005–1007
Publisher
NRC Research Press
Cited
51 citations · more than 87% of similar papers · 2.4× the field average
References
20 works
Access
Paywalled
Research areas
Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Folate and B Vitamins Research · HIV-related health complications and treatments
Keywords
Creatine, Crossover study, Creatine Monohydrate, Medicine, Bioenergetics, Phosphocreatine, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Energy metabolism, Placebo, Chemistry, Biochemistry, Pathology
MeSH
frontal lobe, neurons, humans, hyperhomocysteinemia, creatine, homocysteine, glycine, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, follow-up studies, pilot projects, cross-over studies, double-blind method, up-regulation, dietary supplements, adult, male, quadriceps muscle, serbia, young adult, performance-enhancing substances, middle cerebellar peduncle, biomarkers

4 authors

From RS

  • Sergej M. OstojićUniversity of Novi Sad; University of Belgrade
  • Jelena Nesovic OstojicKlinički centar Vojvodine
  • Patrik DridUniversity of Novi Sad
  • Milan VranešUniversity of Novi Sad

Abstract

In this randomized, double-blind, crossover trial, we evaluated whether 4-week supplementation with guanidinoacetic acid (GAA) is superior to creatine in facilitating creatine levels in healthy men (n = 5). GAA (3.0 g/day) resulted in a more powerful rise (up to 16.2%) in tissue creatine levels in vastus medialis muscle, middle-cerebellar peduncle, and paracentral grey matter, as compared with creatine (P < 0.05). These results indicate that GAA as a preferred alternative to creatine for improved bioenergetics in energy-demanding tissues.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.