Randomized controlled trial2016

Use of Cold-Water Immersion to Reduce Muscle Damage and Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness and Preserve Muscle Power in Jiu-Jitsu Athletes

Fonseca LB, Brito CJ, Silva RJ, Silva-Grigoletto ME, da Silva WM, Franchini E

Journal of athletic training · 44 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2016-07-01 · J Athl Train · vol. 51 · issue 7 · pp. 540–549
Publisher
National Athletic Trainers' Association
Cited
71 citations · more than 96% of similar papers · 5.5× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
50 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Exercise and Physiological Responses · Therapeutic Uses of Natural Elements · Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
Medicine, Muscle damage, Creatine kinase, Lactate dehydrogenase, Muscle power, Crossover study, myalgia, Delayed onset muscle soreness, Athletes, Internal medicine, Physical therapy, Chemistry
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, humans, athletic injuries, water, l-lactate dehydrogenase, creatine kinase, pain measurement, treatment outcome, hydrotherapy, hypothermia, induced, cross-over studies, immersion, recovery of function, martial arts, adult, male, myalgia

6 authors

From BR

  • Líllian Beatriz FonsecaUniversidade Federal de Sergipe
  • Ciro José BritoUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora; Universidade de São Paulo
  • Roberto Jerônimo dos Santos SilvaUniversidade Federal de Sergipe
  • Marzo Edir Da Silva‐GrigolettoUniversidade Federal de Sergipe
  • Walderi Monteiro da Silva JúniorUniversidade Federal de Sergipe
  • Émerson FranchiniUniversidade de São Paulo

Abstract

Context

Cold-water immersion (CWI) has been applied widely as a recovery method, but little evidence is available to support its effectiveness.

Objective

To investigate the effects of CWI on muscle damage, perceived muscle soreness, and muscle power recovery of the upper and lower limbs after jiu-jitsu training.

Design

Crossover study.

Setting

Laboratory and field.

Patients or other participants

A total of 8 highly trained male athletes (age = 24.0 ± 3.6 years, mass = 78.4 ± 2.4 kg, percentage of body fat = 13.1% ± 3.6%) completed all study phases.

Intervention(s)

We randomly selected half of the sample for recovery using CWI (6.0°C ± 0.5°C) for 19 minutes; the other participants were allocated to the control condition (passive recovery). Treatments were reversed in the second session (after 1 week).

Main outcome measure(s)

We measured serum levels of creatine phosphokinase, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase enzymes; perceived muscle soreness; and recovery through visual analogue scales and muscle power of the upper and lower limbs at pretraining, postrecovery, 24 hours, and 48 hours.

Results

Athletes who underwent CWI showed better posttraining recovery measures because circulating LDH levels were lower at 24 hours postrecovery in the CWI condition (441.9 ± 81.4 IU/L) than in the control condition (493.6 ± 97.4 IU/L; P = .03). Estimated muscle power was higher in the CWI than in the control condition for both upper limbs (757.9 ± 125.1 W versus 695.9 ± 56.1 W) and lower limbs (53.7 ± 3.7 cm versus 35.5 ± 8.2 cm; both P values = .001). In addition, we observed less perceived muscle soreness (1.5 ± 1.1 arbitrary units [au] versus 3.1 ± 1.0 au; P = .004) and higher perceived recovery (8.8 ± 1.9 au versus 6.9 ± 1.7 au; P = .005) in the CWI than in the control condition at 24 hours postrecovery.

Conclusions

Use of CWI can be beneficial to jiu-jitsu athletes because it reduces circulating LDH levels, results in less perceived muscle soreness, and helps muscle power recovery at 24 hours postrecovery.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.