Potential health hazards of eating red meat
Wolk A
Journal of internal medicine · 285 citations
How it was studied
- Design
- Meta-analysis (classified by our AI screen)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Clinical events such as disease or death
- Intake measured by
- Not stated
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Independent funding
- Nonprofit
- Swedish Cancer Foundation
- University or hospital
- Karolinska Institutet
- Government
- Vetenskapsrådet
- Government
- Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
Based on 4 listed funder(s).
Publication
- Published
- 2016-09-06 · J Intern Med · vol. 281 · issue 2 · pp. 106–122
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Cited
- 526 citations · more than 100% of similar papers · 26.3× the field average
- Impact
- Top 10% most cited in its field
- References
- 90 works
- Access
- Free to read
- Research areas
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Meat and Animal Product Quality · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Keywords
- Medicine, Red meat, Environmental health, Food science, Pathology
- MeSH
- humans, neoplasms, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, type 2, chronic disease, incidence, mortality, feeding behavior, environment, food handling, red meat
1 author
From SE
- Alicja Wolk · correspondingKarolinska Institutet
Abstract
Red meat (beef, veal, pork, lamb and mutton) consumption contributes several important nutrients to the diet, for example essential amino acids, vitamins (including B12) and minerals (including iron and zinc). Processed red meat (ham, sausages, bacon, frankfurters, salami, etc.) undergoes treatment (curing, smoking, salting or the use of chemical preservatives and additives) to improve its shelf life and/or taste. During recent decades, consumption of red meat has been increasing globally, especially in developing countries. At the same time, there has been growing evidence that high consumption of red meat, especially of processed meat, may be associated with an increased risk of several major chronic diseases. Here, a comprehensive summary is provided of the accumulated evidence based on prospective cohort studies regarding the potential adverse health effects of red meat consumption on major chronic diseases, such as diabetes, coronary heart disease, heart failure, stroke and cancer at several sites, and mortality. Risk estimates from pooled analyses and meta-analyses are presented together with recently published findings. Based on at least six cohorts, summary results for the consumption of unprocessed red meat of 100 g day-1 varied from nonsignificant to statistically significantly increased risk (11% for stroke and for breast cancer, 15% for cardiovascular mortality, 17% for colorectal and 19% for advanced prostate cancer); for the consumption of 50 g day-1 processed meat, the risks were statistically significantly increased for most of the studied diseases (4% for total prostate cancer, 8% for cancer mortality, 9% for breast, 18% for colorectal and 19% for pancreatic cancer, 13% for stroke, 22% for total and 24% for cardiovascular mortality and 32% for diabetes). Potential biological mechanisms underlying the observed risks and the environmental impact of red meat production are also discussed. The evidence-based integrated message is that it is plausible to conclude that high consumption of red meat, and especially processed meat, is associated with an increased risk of several major chronic diseases and preterm mortality. Production of red meat involves an environmental burden. Therefore, some European countries have already integrated these two issues, human health and the 'health of the planet', into new dietary guidelines and recommended limiting consumption of red meat.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.