Study2016Industry funded

Funded in part by Amarin Corporation, Amarin Pharma

Eicosapentaenoic acid reduces membrane fluidity, inhibits cholesterol domain formation, and normalizes bilayer width in atherosclerotic-like model membranes

Mason RP, Jacob RF, Shrivastava S, Sherratt SCR, Chattopadhyay A

Biochimica et biophysica acta · 129 citations

Review labels

Industry fundedMechanisms only

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
In vitro/mechanistic study (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
Cells or lab samples
Main outcome
Mechanisms only

Who paid for it

Funding
Industry funded
Company
Amarin Corporation
Government
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
Government
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India
Company
Amarin Pharma

Based on 4 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2016-10-09 · Biochim Biophys Acta · vol. 1858 · issue 12 · pp. 3131–3140
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Cited
177 citations · more than 98% of similar papers · 7.7× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
76 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Fatty Acid Research and Health · Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism · Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Keywords
Bilayer, Eicosapentaenoic acid, Membrane, Membrane fluidity, Lipid bilayer, Cholesterol, Biophysics, Chemistry, Internal medicine, Materials science, Medicine, Biochemistry, Fatty acid, Biology, Polyunsaturated fatty acid
MeSH
humans, cholesterol, docosahexaenoic acids, eicosapentaenoic acid, lipid bilayers, membrane fluidity, dose-response relationship, drug, atherosclerosis

5 authors

From US, IN

  • Richard Preston Mason · correspondingBrigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
  • Robert Francis Jacob
  • Sandeep Kumar ShrivastavaCentre for Cellular and Molecular Biology
  • Samuel C. R. Sherratt
  • Amitabha ChattopadhyayCentre for Cellular and Molecular Biology

Abstract

Cholesterol crystalline domains characterize atherosclerotic membranes, altering vascular signaling and function. Omega-3 fatty acids reduce membrane lipid peroxidation and subsequent cholesterol domain formation. We evaluated non-peroxidation-mediated effects of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), other TG-lowering agents, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and other long-chain fatty acids on membrane fluidity, bilayer width, and cholesterol domain formation in model membranes. In membranes prepared at 1.5:1 cholesterol-to-phospholipid (C/P) mole ratio (creating pre-existing domains), EPA, glycyrrhizin, arachidonic acid, and alpha linolenic acid promoted the greatest reductions in cholesterol domains (by 65.5%, 54.9%, 46.8%, and 45.2%, respectively) compared to controls; other treatments had modest effects. EPA effects on cholesterol domain formation were dose-dependent. In membranes with 1:1 C/P (predisposing domain formation), DHA, but not EPA, dose-dependently increased membrane fluidity. DHA also induced cholesterol domain formation without affecting temperature-induced changes in-bilayer unit cell periodicity relative to controls (d-space; 57Å-55Å over 15-30°C). Together, these data suggest simultaneous formation of distinct cholesterol-rich ordered domains and cholesterol-poor disordered domains in the presence of DHA. By contrast, EPA had no effect on cholesterol domain formation and produced larger d-space values relative to controls (60Å-57Å; p<0.05) over the same temperature range, suggesting a more uniform maintenance of lipid dynamics despite the presence of cholesterol. These data indicate that EPA and DHA had different effects on membrane bilayer width, membrane fluidity, and cholesterol crystalline domain formation; suggesting omega-3 fatty acids with differing chain length or unsaturation may differentially influence membrane lipid dynamics and structural organization as a result of distinct phospholipid/sterol interactions.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.