Study2017Industry funded

Funded in part by Cereal Partners Worldwide

Providing evidence to support the development of whole grain dietary recommendations in the United Kingdom

Mann KD, Pearce MS, Seal CJ

The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · 15 citations

Review labels

Industry fundedNo stated lifestyle adjustment

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Cross-sectional study (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Food diaries or recalls

Who paid for it

Funding
Industry funded
Nonprofit
British Nutrition Foundation
University or hospital
University College London
Company
Cereal Partners Worldwide
Government
Medical Research Council

Based on 4 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2016-10-21 · Proc Nutr Soc · vol. 76 · issue 3 · pp. 369–377
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Cited
22 citations · more than 87% of similar papers · 2.3× the field average
References
59 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Food composition and properties · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
Medicine, Environmental health, Observational study, Obesity, Whole grains, Food intake, Public health, Gerontology, Biology, Pathology, Food science, Internal medicine
MeSH
humans, chronic disease, risk, dietetics, evidence-based medicine, biomedical research, adult, child, health promotion, societies, scientific, nutritional sciences, congresses as topic, randomized controlled trials as topic, child nutritional physiological phenomena, observational studies as topic, whole grains, united kingdom, diet, healthy

3 authors

From GB

  • Kay D. Mann · correspondingNIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre; Newcastle University
  • Mark Stephen PearceNewcastle University
  • Chris J. SealNIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre; Newcastle University

Abstract

Observational evidence suggests that increased whole grain (WG) intake reduces the risks of many non-communicable diseases, such as CVD, type 2 diabetes, obesity and certain cancers. More recently, studies have shown that WG intake lowers all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Much of the reported evidence on risk reduction is from US and Scandinavian populations, where there are tangible WG dietary recommendations. At present there is no quantity-specific WG dietary recommendation in the UK, instead we are advised to choose WG or higher fibre versions. Despite recognition of WG as an important component of a healthy diet, monitoring of WG intake in the UK has been poor, with the latest intake assessment from data collected in 2000-2001 for adults and in 1997 for children. To update this information we examined WG intake in the National Diet and Nutrition Survey rolling programme 2008-2011 after developing our database of WG food composition, a key resource in determining WG intake accurately. The results showed median WG intakes remain low in both adults and children and below that of countries with quantity-specific guidance. We also found a reduction in C-reactive protein concentrations and leucocyte counts with increased WG intake, although no association with other markers of cardio-metabolic health. The recent recommendations by the UK Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition to increase dietary fibre intake will require a greater emphasis on consuming more WG. Specific recommendations on WG intake in the UK are warranted as is the development of public health policy to promote consumption of these important foods.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.