Randomized controlled trial2017

Dietary nitrate supplementation and exercise tolerance in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Hirai DM, Zelt JT, Jones JH, Castanhas LG, Bentley RF, Earle W, Staples P, Tschakovsky ME, McCans J, O'Donnell DE, Neder JA

American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 56 citations

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
University or hospital
John A. Alexander Stewart Fellowship, Dept. of Medicine, Queen's University
University or hospital
Senate Advisory Research Committee Postdoctoral Fellow Support Program, Dept. of Medicine, Queen's University

Based on 2 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2016-10-27 · Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol · vol. 312 · issue 1 · pp. R13–R22
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Cited
67 citations · more than 100% of similar papers · 23.4× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
64 works
Access
Open access (repository copy) · OTHER-OA
Research areas
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology · Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control · Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
Medicine, Cardiology, Ejection fraction, Heart failure, Internal medicine, Stroke volume, Hemodynamics, Crossover study, Blood pressure, Heart rate, Cardiac output, Nitric oxide, Placebo, Oxygenation, Anesthesia
MeSH
humans, ventricular dysfunction, left, nitrates, stroke volume, exercise test, treatment outcome, double-blind method, exercise tolerance, dietary supplements, middle aged, male, heart failure

11 authors

From CA, BR

  • Daniel M. Hirai · correspondingQueen's University; Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Joel T. ZeltQueen's University
  • Joshua H. JonesQueen's University
  • Luiza G. CastanhasQueen's University
  • Robert Francis BentleyQueen's University
  • Wendy EarleQueen's University

Abstract

Endothelial dysfunction and reduced nitric oxide (NO) signaling are key abnormalities leading to skeletal muscle oxygen delivery-utilization mismatch and poor physical capacity in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Oral inorganic nitrate supplementation provides an exogenous source of NO that may enhance locomotor muscle function and oxygenation with consequent improvement in exercise tolerance in HFrEF. Thirteen patients (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%) were enrolled in a double-blind, randomized crossover study to receive concentrated nitrate-rich (nitrate) or nitrate-depleted (placebo) beetroot juice for 9 days. Low- and high-intensity constant-load cardiopulmonary exercise tests were performed with noninvasive measurements of central hemodynamics (stroke volume, heart rate, and cardiac output via impedance cardiography), arterial blood pressure, pulmonary oxygen uptake, quadriceps muscle oxygenation (near-infrared spectroscopy), and blood lactate concentration. Ten patients completed the study with no adverse clinical effects. Nitrate-rich supplementation resulted in significantly higher plasma nitrite concentration compared with placebo (240 ± 48 vs. 56 ± 8 nM, respectively; P 0.05). Similarly, there were no significant differences in central hemodynamics, arterial blood pressure, pulmonary oxygen uptake kinetics, skeletal muscle oxygenation, or blood lactate concentration from rest to low- or high-intensity exercise between conditions. Oral inorganic nitrate supplementation with concentrated beetroot juice did not present with beneficial effects on central or peripheral components of the oxygen transport pathway thereby failing to improve exercise tolerance in patients with moderate HFrEF.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.