Randomized controlled trial2016Industry funded

Funded in part by Quest Diagnostics

Cholecalciferol v. ergocalciferol for 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) repletion in chronic kidney disease: a randomised clinical trial

Wetmore JB, Kimber C, Mahnken JD, Stubbs JR

The British journal of nutrition · 25 citations

Review labels

Industry funded

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Industry funded
Company
Quest Diagnostics
Government
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Government
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Government
NIDDK NIH HHS
Government
NCATS NIH HHS
Grants
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23 DK085378); National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR000001)

Based on 5 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2016-12-28 · Br J Nutr · vol. 116 · issue 12 · pp. 2074–2081
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Cited
35 citations · more than 92% of similar papers · 3.2× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
31 works
Access
Free to read
Research areas
Vitamin D Research Studies · Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments · Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Keywords
Ergocalciferol, Cholecalciferol, Vitamin D and neurology, Medicine, Internal medicine, vitamin D deficiency, Endocrinology, Kidney disease, Gastroenterology, Parathyroid hormone, Population, Calcium
MeSH
humans, vitamin d deficiency, cholecalciferol, calcifediol, calcitriol, ergocalciferols, 25-hydroxyvitamin d 2, parathyroid hormone, cohort studies, follow-up studies, double-blind method, reproducibility of results, dietary supplements, adult, aged, middle aged, academic medical centers, outpatient clinics, hospital, kansas, female, male, renal insufficiency, chronic

4 authors

From US

  • James B. WetmoreHennepin County Medical Center
  • Cassandra KimberUniversity of Kansas Medical Center
  • Jonathan D. MahnkenUniversity of Kansas Medical Center
  • Jason R. Stubbs · correspondingUniversity of Kansas Medical Center

Abstract

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) demonstrate complex mineral metabolism derangements and a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency. However, the optimal method of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) repletion is unknown, and trials analysing the comparative efficacy of cholecalciferol and ergocalciferol in this population are lacking. We conducted a randomised clinical trial of cholecalciferol 1250μg (50 000 IU) weekly v. ergocalciferol 1250μg (50 000 IU) weekly for 12 weeks in forty-four non-dialysis-dependent patients with stage 3-5 CKD. The primary outcome was change in total 25(OH)D from baseline to week 12 (immediately after therapy). Secondary analyses included the change in 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D), parathyroid hormone (PTH), D2 and D3 sub-fractions of 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D and total 25(OH)D from baseline to week 18 (6 weeks after therapy). Cholecalciferol therapy yielded a greater change in total 25(OH)D (45·0 (sd 16·5) ng/ml) v. ergocalciferol (30·7 (sd 15·3) ng/ml) from baseline to week 12 (P<0·01); this observation partially resulted from a substantial reduction in the 25(OH)D3 sub-fraction with ergocalciferol. However, following cessation of therapy, no statistical difference was observed for total 25(OH)D change from baseline to week 18 between cholecalciferol and ergocalciferol groups (22·4 (sd 12·7) v. 17·6 (sd 8·9) ng/ml, respectively; P=0·17). We observed no significant difference between these therapies with regard to changes in serum PTH or 1,25(OH)2D. Therapy with cholecalciferol, compared with ergocalciferol, is more effective at raising serum 25(OH)D in non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients while active therapy is ongoing. However, levels of 25(OH)D declined substantially in both arms following cessation of therapy, suggesting the need for maintenance therapy to sustain levels.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.