Improvement of Performance and Reduction of Fatigue With Low-Level Laser Therapy in Competitive Cyclists
Lanferdini FJ, Bini RR, Baroni BM, Klein KD, Carpes FP, Vaz MA
International journal of sports physiology and performance · 34 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Health markers and function
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2017-04-19 · Int J Sports Physiol Perform · vol. 13 · issue 1 · pp. 14–22
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Cited
- 48 citations · more than 96% of similar papers · 5.3× the field average
- Impact
- Top 10% most cited in its field
- References
- 64 works
- Access
- Paywalled
- Research areas
- Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Sports Performance and Training
- Keywords
- Low level laser therapy, Physical therapy, Reduction (mathematics), Medicine, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Laser therapy, Psychology, Laser, Mathematics, Optics, Physics
- MeSH
- humans, exercise test, cross-over studies, double-blind method, muscle fatigue, physical endurance, bicycling, adult, male, quadriceps muscle, low-level light therapy
6 authors
- Fábio Juner Lanferdini
- Rodrigo Rico Bini
- Bruno Manfredini Baroni
- Kelli Daiana Klein
- Felipe P. Carpes
- Marco Aurélio Vaz
Abstract
Evidence indicates that low-level laser therapy (LLLT) minimizes fatigue effects on muscle performance. However, the ideal LLLT dosage to improve athletes'performance during sports activities such as cycling is still unclear. Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate the effects of different LLLT dosages on cyclists'performance in time-to-exhaustion tests. In addition, the effects of LLLT on the frequency content of the EMG signals to assess fatigue mechanisms were examined. Twenty male competitive cyclists participated in a crossover, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. They performed an incremental cycling test to exhaustion (on day 1) followed by 4 time-to-exhaustion tests (on days 2-5) at their individual maximal power output. Before each time-to-exhaustion test, different dosages of LLLT (135, 270, and 405 J/thigh, respectively) or placebo were applied at the quadriceps muscle bilaterally. Power output and muscle activation from both lower limbs were recorded throughout the tests. Increased performance in time-to-exhaustion tests was observed with the LLLT-135 J (∼22 s; P < .01), LLLT-270 J (∼13 s; P = .03), and LLLT-405 J (∼13 s; P = .02) compared to placebo (149 ± 23 s). Although LLLT-270 J and LLLT-405 J did not show significant differences in muscle activation compared with placebo, LLLT-135 J led to an increased high-frequency content compared with placebo in both limbs at the end of the exhaustion test (P ≤ .03). In conclusion, LLLT increased time to exhaustion in competitive cyclists, suggesting this intervention as a possible nonpharmacological ergogenic agent in cycling. Among the different dosages, LLLT-135 J seems to promote the best effects.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.