Randomized controlled trial2018

Improvement of Performance and Reduction of Fatigue With Low-Level Laser Therapy in Competitive Cyclists

Lanferdini FJ, Bini RR, Baroni BM, Klein KD, Carpes FP, Vaz MA

International journal of sports physiology and performance · 34 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2017-04-19 · Int J Sports Physiol Perform · vol. 13 · issue 1 · pp. 14–22
Publisher
Human Kinetics
Cited
48 citations · more than 96% of similar papers · 5.3× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
64 works
Access
Paywalled
Research areas
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
Low level laser therapy, Physical therapy, Reduction (mathematics), Medicine, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Laser therapy, Psychology, Laser, Mathematics, Optics, Physics
MeSH
humans, exercise test, cross-over studies, double-blind method, muscle fatigue, physical endurance, bicycling, adult, male, quadriceps muscle, low-level light therapy

6 authors

  • Fábio Juner Lanferdini
  • Rodrigo Rico Bini
  • Bruno Manfredini Baroni
  • Kelli Daiana Klein
  • Felipe P. Carpes
  • Marco Aurélio Vaz

Abstract

Evidence indicates that low-level laser therapy (LLLT) minimizes fatigue effects on muscle performance. However, the ideal LLLT dosage to improve athletes'performance during sports activities such as cycling is still unclear. Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate the effects of different LLLT dosages on cyclists'performance in time-to-exhaustion tests. In addition, the effects of LLLT on the frequency content of the EMG signals to assess fatigue mechanisms were examined. Twenty male competitive cyclists participated in a crossover, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. They performed an incremental cycling test to exhaustion (on day 1) followed by 4 time-to-exhaustion tests (on days 2-5) at their individual maximal power output. Before each time-to-exhaustion test, different dosages of LLLT (135, 270, and 405 J/thigh, respectively) or placebo were applied at the quadriceps muscle bilaterally. Power output and muscle activation from both lower limbs were recorded throughout the tests. Increased performance in time-to-exhaustion tests was observed with the LLLT-135 J (∼22 s; P < .01), LLLT-270 J (∼13 s; P = .03), and LLLT-405 J (∼13 s; P = .02) compared to placebo (149 ± 23 s). Although LLLT-270 J and LLLT-405 J did not show significant differences in muscle activation compared with placebo, LLLT-135 J led to an increased high-frequency content compared with placebo in both limbs at the end of the exhaustion test (P ≤ .03). In conclusion, LLLT increased time to exhaustion in competitive cyclists, suggesting this intervention as a possible nonpharmacological ergogenic agent in cycling. Among the different dosages, LLLT-135 J seems to promote the best effects.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.